147
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 74 points 1 month ago

I did not have "RDJ comes back to the MCU as a non-Stark character" on my bingo card

[-] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

watch it be a multiverse version of Tony Stark.

edit: also if this is legit I am disappointed they didn't long-tease the reveal in movies or post credit scenes. this seems very un-marvel, maybe out of desperation. they straight up blew what could have been the biggest and most shocking reveal in history.

edit 2: also, how long until "I am Dr Doom!"

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Tony made Ultron as the ultimate defense around the world. I could see the idea going a slightly different way and that Tony being a little more ambitious/evil, next thing you know he's Doom.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

I get that I'm in the minority, but I think this is going to not be related to Iron Man at all.

Rdj has range. And Doom wears a mask. I think he decided he was too old to keep playing Tony and wanted to retire the character on a high note, but the movies are fun to make and make him a mint, so when they offered a recast he went for it. But I don't think he'd want to screw with the completed story for Tony Stark's character.

I think RDJ is just going to play Doom, and he'll do a good enough job that no one is going to confuse the characters. Based on his acting choices, that's my guess.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

That just sounds super confusing. I know Marvel has done that with some smaller characters, but Tony Stark is the closest thing the MCU has/had to a main character. If it's not an alternate Ironman it'll just confuse audiences.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

It will almost certainly be a multi verse Tony Stark gone evil.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

And I'll bet anything it's Spider-Man that unmasks him and discovers it, leading to a whole mental breakdown by Peter.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

Hasn't Peter had enough breakdowns yet?

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

With great power, comes great meltdowns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Have you read the comics? If not - Peter Parker is constantly traumatized by shit going horribly wrong or failing to account for something frequently. I'd say it's a running gag but Stan Lee wanted a super hero people could connect with at a human level.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Or a Doombot with Stark’s face to fuck with the Avengers.

[-] [email protected] 51 points 1 month ago

That seems like something they should’ve waited to reveal during the movie, like had some misdirection about RDJ just being in it for a flashback or a recorded video, just downplay it and make it seem small. Then bust the revelation out midway through the movie.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

I'm sure they considered that possibility. But imagine the revenue. RDJ and Doom are both huge draws. Revealing them both in advance gets you more makes money gesture

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Now we can make money and make a shitty movie.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

but you can do that in other ways in-universe as they did with thanos and other upcoming characters. its very un-marvel.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I found this post browsing All. I have had significant superhero fatigue right after infinity war part 2, after a whole decade of mild disbelief at how huge these once-niche characters have become.

This headline definitely grabbed my attention, and as you said, the fact that they’re spoiling that he’s going to play Doom is why I checked this thread.

revealing them both

Even mentioning them as separate things wouldn’t have made me look. Their marketing machine is definitely working overtime to get the attention of people burned out on superhero movies.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don’t like it. Seems weird. An article I read said that he would NOT be playing a multiverse version of Doom, but actually Victor Von Doom.

Now, based on that I have two thoughts:

  1. He was originally a Tony Stark multiverse version but became corrupted and no longer thinks of himself as Tony so he IS Victor Von Doom (like an identity shift).

  2. He has Tony Stark’s face and will be revealed in a mask off moment. However, the twist is that it’s actually a Doombot and Tony’s face is used to mess with the Avengers. Maybe Doombots can have any face he chooses?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Well, they did ask for this treatment with that username.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

I mean it’s definitely odd, but if he’s masked the whole time, then I guess it’s the same as any other actor doing it.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

then by that logic why have RDJ do it anyway.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Studio had about 75 million dollars laying around and figured, "what the hell?"

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I don't agree with the assertion that we definitely won't see his face, but the star power will be a draw.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

well yeah that was my point. if they are using RDJ clearly they are going to use him in a recognizable way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

Well now. That's a course correction.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

So they're doing a hard pivot away from the Kang stuff after the combination of the Majors scandal and underperformance of Quantumania?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

They already have, Loki Season 2 was tossed out the window in re-writes because of it.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

No way lmao. It'll be good I'm sure, but Doom seems like a bigger bad than just one movie. Is he really jumping in for another round of films?

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Is he really jumping in for another round of films?

His bed of money wasn't as comfortable anymore, so he wanted a bit more padding

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

I'm kind of weirdly excited because I've been wanting him to come back as Doctor Doom for awhile now but didn't think it would actually happen.

There's just so much room for character drama with our avengers having to make sense of a villainous version of their hero. Also room to play with the dichotomy of stark being a man of science and Doom more into magic.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Is there a reason you wanted RDJ for Doctor Doom? I haven't read the comics so I'm unfamiliar but I would have expected him not even to be in the conversation. Is there some kind of cannon connection between stark and him? I always thought his link was to the Fantastic Four primarily.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Tony Stark and Victor Von Doom are entirely separate people. Unless there's some bizarre series I'm not aware of connecting them.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

There was a short comic run where Dr. Doom becomes Ironman after Tony dies that I really liked. The only thing connecting them is that they're both dudes in suits of armor otherwise.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Iron Man can't be Doc Doom. No.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

There's actually a multiverse where tony stark becomes doom. Just an fyi

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

MCU doesn’t really have a ‘proper’ Reed Richards, so the alternate universe Evil Reed from Secret Wars couldn’t work that way. The only brains of the MCU that could fill that role in that plot would be either Stark or Bannon, and the latter is a) still alive and b) already his own foil and his genius isn’t really played in the same way anyway. B-list alternative would be Hank Pym but he’s not been central to the MCU in anything like the same way as the other two.

Honestly I think it might work pretty well story-wise. Though actual reason is just… well, money. And the course correction aspect previously mentioned in these comments.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
147 points (88.9% liked)

Marvel Studios

2963 readers
44 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to MarvelStudios, a community for discussing all things related to Marvel TV/Film productions with a focus on Marvel Studios!

We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about Marvel Studios productions. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Upcoming TV/Film:


MCU TV/Film Discussion:


Non-MCU Discussion:


Misc Discussion:


Related Communities:


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS