this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
337 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59298 readers
4608 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Elon Musk’s X platform is under pressure from data regulators after it emerged that users are consenting to their posts being used to build artificial intelligence systems via a default setting on the app.

The UK and Irish data watchdogs said they have contacted X over the apparent attempt to gain user consent for data harvesting without them knowing about it.

An X user highlighted the issue on Friday, pointing to a setting on the app that activated by default and permitted the account holder’s posts to be used for training Grok, an AI chatbot built by Musk’s xAI business.

Under UK GDPR, which is based on the EU data regulation of the same name, companies are not allowed to use “pre-ticked boxes” or “any other method of default consent”.

The setting, which comes with an already ticked box, states that you “allow your posts as well as your interactions, inputs and results with Grok to be used for training and fine-tuning”. According to the X user, the setting can only be turned off on the web version of X.

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This is kind of hilarous because, so far, Grok has been a joke in LLM land, and Elon basically lied about his commitment to open sourcing their stuff.

And training an AI on Twitter data? Who thought that was a good idea? That's just a step above training on 4chan or YouTube comment threads (the former of which is actually a thing).

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You’re being very generous to say it’s a, “step above…”.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

I dunno, YouTube comments boggle my mind even more than Twitter ones.

4chan is probably better though. The models trained on 4chan data are actually kinda hilarious.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If you still have a Twitter account, now it's a good time to flood Twitter with Sonic porn and random snippets of erotic fan fiction.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

We did this already

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

Bruh that began like 10 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago

Basically everyone (noticeably a bunch of people/organisations I definitely would like to follow) still seem to use Xitter as a platform for PR... Please, just stop :(

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago

I bet the damn checkbox doesn’t even do anything.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

You know what was super hilarious? Reading about this on the /r/privacy subreddit. Reading about how stupid Xitter users are on a website that already openly sells all user data to "OpenAI".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Probably doesn't matter but I'm very glad I wiped my accounts when I left.