this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
199 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3784 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 104 points 3 months ago

Who really cares if a president fudges the numbers on a mortgage application for a beach house?

Hopefully everybody else who is supposed to be punished for breaking the law. Honestly, if there are laws that aren't important enough to enforce when the president breaks them, they shouldn't be laws.

Now I get the worry about frivolous lawsuits, but it wasn't like that was an issue at all because our court systems favor the wealthy and powerful already. That is why the whole SCOTUS decision was bullshit just like the filibuster.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It needs to happen, along with a Supreme Court amendment.

But the bar is too high.

An amendment starts by getting 290 votes in the House which a) is currently controlled by Republicans and b) Barely gets a simple 218 vote majority to decide who their own leader even is.

The last time they exceeded 290 was to bounce out George Santos. That's how bad it has to get.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is why I thought Joe should've been the fall guy for this. Start being the dictator the Supreme Court says he's allowed to be an then Republicans will immediately snap to and passing this amendment will be their highest priority. He doesn't even have to drop bombs or anything. Order troops to go into GOP controlled states and help boost voter registration.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

I like the cut of your jib, stranger.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

I don't think you could pass a constitutional amendment stating the sky is blue right now.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This has zero chance of ever, ever making it. Especially in the wake of the more recent SC rulings.

Members of the GOP see themselves in one of two ways right now:

  • Acolytes of the Lord God Almighty Trump, ready to take their position as a member of the ruling class and enact their far-right agenda on the peasants in Trump's name.
  • Future leaders of the Republican party themselves, just waiting for the day they can shape the country in their own image in Trump's honor once he's gone. And by "shape the country", i obviously mean fleece people out of as much money as possible since there's fuck-all they can do about it.

There is zero chance you're going to get a single Republican congressman or governor to sign off on a constitutional amendment stripping themselves of the very powers that they either are already wielding or one day hope to wield. Nobody has ever, ever voted away their own authoritarian power.

This had a mild chance of passage before the Trump immunity ruling, when it would have been merely answering questions that the founding fathers left unanswered. Can a President pardon himself? Stuff like that. But now that the SC has taken it upon themselves to answer the questions and essentially give the President uncheckable power, an amendment would no longer be viewed as clarifying the intent of the founding fathers, but would be viewed as stripping the powers of the Presidency. And like I said, good luck getting anybody to vote away their own power.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

We can’t pass an equal rights amendment, and we are, if memory serves, ONE state away from a convention of the states. This unfortunately isn’t going anywhere.

Doesn’t mean there isn’t value in introducing it, of course. Just that it’s not a serious, practical proposal.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Joe Morelle has been doing awesome lately. No doubt fueled by late-night Garbage Plates and Genny Cream Ale.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The nostalgia of this comment, chef's kiss

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Your downvotes are likely the ones who get those.... issues.... with Genny Cream Ale

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As a current Rochesterian. Genny cream ale is just the worst Genesee brew, all their other stuff is good. Even genny light is better than the cream.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's super cheap, though, so a good fit for young people with no money who can withstand its famous effects on your bodily functions.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Nothing will plug the hole left by Trump versus the United States, as he continues to attack American values and interests all over the world.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)