UK Nature and Environment

426 readers

45 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our winter banner is a shot of Shotley marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Revealed: Tories failed to do impact check before approving banned pesticide (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Conservative government did not carry out a legally required assessment of how greenlighting the use of a banned pesticide, described as a “death blow to wildlife”, would affect some of the most important nature sites, documents have revealed.

The previous government gave emergency approval this year for sugar beet farmers to use Cruiser SB for the fourth year in a row.

A single teaspoon of this pesticide is enough to deliver a lethal dose to 1.25 billion bees. In granting approval, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) went against the advice of the Health and Safety Executive and the UK expert committee on pesticides.

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

I wonder how much the bribe was that Syngenta paid them to approve it's use.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

emergency

fourth year in a row

LOL

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Well colour me shocked! Shocked, I say! What's the likelihood of Labour overturning that decision, I wonder?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

A legally required assessment.

That means there will be repurcussions for the Tories that approved this, right? Right?!

Fines, community service, jail. We'll definitely see these things happen, yeah?