this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
9 points (90.9% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4661 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is a crazy amount of money to me as someone from the UK. A party running a candidate in every seat in a UK general election could not spend this much money campaigning

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

The best democracy money can buy!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I gave her some money. Wanted to show that I approved of the new course of the campaign. Get some fresh blood in there

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Oof. Good way to hand the presidency over to Trump.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You already made a top level comment saying the same. Shut the fuck up and get out of the way, you're not contributing to the conversation by just parroting "Good job promoting Trump by promoting his strongest contender" over and over again. Either make an argument so there's something to discuss, or leave.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (10 children)

The dichotomy is insane. At one side of their mouth, they talk about getting money out of politics, Out of the other side, they talk about raising $50 million in seven hours as a good thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

You unfortunately have to play by the rules of the game as it exists before you can have the control to change the rules for the future.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Would you have us believe that while money is still the deciding factor in politics, we should let our own political campaigns starve and die so that strangers on the internet can't falsely accuse us of being hypocrites? 🙄😮‍💨

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I'm fairly certain legit donations to an election campaign is not the major problem with money in politics.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Seems to be a near copy paste of another comment. This is concerning.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

For the folks who mistake this as a good-faith argument, let me disprove it. It is illegal to misappropriate campaign funds for any purpose other than the election campaign. The only people "getting rich" from the donations made are the wages paid to employees of the election organization. They are not making 7 figure salaries off this. Most of the funds will be spent on running advertisements, booking venues for speeches, and hiring more people to manage it all. This will create (temporary) jobs for common folks, not deepen the pocket of the elite.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

If they stopped taking money for their campaigns, you'd be complaining that they're disarming themselves against the oncoming threat of fascism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Is this all you got? What a crock of shit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

The alternative is to unilaterally disarm?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Yet you participate in society! Curious! I am very intelligent.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don't even trust the upvoted comments on this board. They read just like shills.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Kamala is a terrible choice and it's a guaranteed way to hand the presidency over to Trump.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Kamala 2024! Let's go! You're wrong and I cannot wait for all the haters to eat shit when she wins.