this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
24 points (96.2% liked)

Firefox

4216 readers
77 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Yea, yea.

Then why didn't you announce it with fanfare, instead of saying nothing and enabling it automatically?

What is it the anti-encryption crowd say again? "If you've got nothing to hide..."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because Mozilla is bad a communication, often.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

While this is true, this feature is still a good one to have enabled.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Its good to have other people who have enabled it. As long as their is no way the current trackers can detect ive disabled it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

It doesn't share information about you in the first place, and nothing happens at all if you block ads.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Digital advertising is not going away

My pihole and ublock origin say otherwise.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Some sites don't work with ad blockers enabled. Yes, one can avoid those as much as possible, but some small maintainer of neat online services (no, not Google, Meta, MS, ...) also need their bills payed. So ads without tracking, i.e. collection of personal data, imho are a toad to swallow.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Some sites don't work with ad blockers enabled.

Some foods taste bad. One simply eats different foods.

some small maintainer of neat online services (no, not Google, Meta, MS, ...) also need their bills payed.

If they can't afford to host it at no cost to the user then they should charge for it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If they can't afford to host it at no cost to the user then they should charge for it.

That's a lot more complex than displaying some ads.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

It's also more respectful to users and doesn't create perverse incentives or invite third party ad servers to give their customers malware.