Git

I've only worked in software for about 15 years, so don't have much experience outside of git.

But my first job used Microsoft Team Foundation, and I didn't need any experience to know that user experience sucked. I've also done the "date named zip file" type of version control, which is not ideal.

When I started using git it just made sense to me, have had no major complaints since.

I've been using Git professionally as a software developer for 15 years, and I think it sucks quite hard. There is always a dosen ways to do the same thing, it occupies tons of hardware space, it's log is unstructured data that has to be parsed. Git CLI is an incomprehensible mess of bloat and misnomers, so no matter what team/project you are working on, there is always going to be 1-5 Git commands they'll tell "you are NEVER supposed to use".

I've completed my courses on Git, I've worked with CI/CD, onboarded younger developers, read "Git Koans", and I haven't seen even a theoretically convenient VCS until someone showed me Pijul.

Git is mess, it sucks that we are stuck with it, and every time someone says it's the best VCS we have, it saddens me.

Having used SCCS, RCS, CVS, SVN and then Git - like a progression of successive added features - as well as clearcase, I find the biggest difference when stepping up to git was the flinging of patchballs via the push mechanism.

I like how every working dir is really kinda a repo, and the ability to pick back into a repo from a suitably rich checkout has been a life-saver from time to time.

Having marshalled my own builds by hand or by cron, I do like the CI stuff in gitlab to trigger CIs and CDs; but the stuff in forgejo and GitHub can go to hell without any supper. Enough goddamned YAML, please.

As I think of projects I recently ditched before I started playing with CI, too, I almost want to pick them back up. We talk on another thread about the wasting death of good projects because the greybeards are dying and the kids dont have the time and clue to pick up after them, but maybe this automation will help them to keep maintaining their stuff (and someone else's) just a bit longer.

Git is good things. Clearcase was awesome but IBM destroyed the best company I ever worked for and bought Rational and withheld licenses while doing so, so they and clearcase can die in the same firey hell as YAML.

As an ancient ops person, I was unfamiliar with version control before git. So git has really changed how I look at look at version control!

Too new to have come from older vcs, but I can tell it's a clear improvement over zip files.

The staging area changed the way I work for the better. When I develop something, a file can be at the same time "not modified yet," in progress where I can carefully accept or reject the modifications, and partially done when the parts have been confirmed and added to the staging area.

Once nothing is "in progress" anymore, I know that my future commit is almost perfect and I can quickly review my stuff before committing. It’s faster and more safe than other tools.

Local vcs let's you decouple saving progress (commit) from publishing your change (push).

This is a huge improvement over exclusive locks (old visual source safe) and shared server (like perforce).

There are many other improvements, but that is the one that had the most impact on my daily workflow.