208
I also have a list of people I want to mur...arrest. the difference is I would never act on it because I am a real human with a moral compass and not a cowardly cunt.
nothing says healthy democracy like a competitave candidate having a "secretary of retribution"
This guy is a violent extremist that needs to.be treated and dealt with as such.
Lots of luck with that. You are likely on his list now. The Democrats will likely fuck up so bad that this will become reality next year.
We're going to have to have another civil war, aren't we?
Tap for spoiler
Raiklin is seeking to enlist so-called “constitutional” sheriffs in rural, conservative counties across the country to detain Trump’s political enemies.
Isn't is fun how, the more contrary to the spirit of the constitution something is, the more likely the Trump cult and its predecessors are to literally slap "constitutional" in front of the noun?
First there was "constitutional carry": walking around displaying mass murder enablers to intimidate political opponents because a bunch of demagogues and activist judges had deliberately misinterpreted an obsolete amendment.
Then there was the "constitutional electors" tasked with stealing an election for Trump.
Now there's "constitutional sheriffs" tasked with being Trump's version of Hitler's SS, Stalin's KGB, or Mussolini's OVRA.
The bad timeline.
Sounds so totally normal.
Here’s his substack, the Deep State Marauder. I wonder if he’d like to enroll in the lingerie of the month club? 🤔
Anyone have a link I don't have to make an account for?
he would be called Ivan
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
208 points (97.7% liked)
politics
18881 readers
4041 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS