this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
153 points (98.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5146 readers
452 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

I'm mad about this and I hate how powerless climate change makes me feel.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The climate crisis is bad for the economy. Any "fiscal conservative" concern-trolling about "not wanting to hurt the economy" by addressing the climate crisis is either a denier or a liar. They just want to keep on living their lavish, irresponsible lifestyles on their children's dime.

These pension fund investments are just one vehicle for propping up their grotesquely unsustainable system until they die and can foot us with the bill.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Probably because of corporate lobbying.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because that's where the money is, and a pension fund's one and only job is to make money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Fossil fuels make money, but so do renewables and a lot of other companies, which use energy much less directly. The issue is that a national pension fund is a government institution and the Canadian government gets a very real conflict of intresst between fighting climate change and paying pensions. So it is much better to invest in other fields. It does not have to be renewables.