"According to US media, the post was made by a now-deleted account that regularly trolls the social media pages of the New York court system."
Hopefully this is true and nothing comes of it.
this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
138 points (96.0% liked)
News
23275 readers
3428 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
When was the account created, I wonder. Just in time for the trial? Created in order to do this very thing and disrupt the trial?
Prediction: this will be the basis of their appeal.
If I'm wrong, I shall record the fry-up and consumption of a delicious bratwurst.
Yeah look you should do a practice run on that, just in case
It's never a bad day for bratwurst, hey??
And if you're right, you're still eating that bratwurst, right?
What happens off-camera stays off-camera
It's a bit premature to be making that prediction. If no further evidence comes forth that it isn't a random shitposter, then it's a complete nothingwurst.
No need to appeal if this is true. The judge will more than likely have to declare a mistrial
If this is true that may have been the whole intent of the comment.
I don't get it? What is the news here. Someone made a random post on Facebook? Surely a million others also posted with blind certainty that he was going to be convicted, just as a few other millioka must have posted he wouldn't. What makes this instance different? Is this the glitch to get out of jail free? Just rob a bank and ask your cousins to make a post saying he know you'll be convicted!
If the claim in the comment is true it means a juror broke the secrecy rules, and this could make it a mistrial, essentially. I'm guessing they need to find this commenter and work out if what they were saying is true or if it was a troll.
For fuck sake.... This cannot be the first time someone trolls the court. So anytime sometime happens just make a fake account to plant doubt and go for a mistrial. Like 5mins and a VPN and anyone can get off Scott free if you can afford a lawyer to move for a mistrial. Like fuck this shit.
Stop giving this man outs, stop making a joke of the justice system.
"If the claim is true", means they have to connect the account to someone related to a juror first. So if you make a troll post using a VPN, nothing will come of it (and rightly so).
Right? Couldn't somebody just post "I'm Michael Anderson's cousin and he's full of shit" and that would balance out the original post since they are both just made up?
It has already been debunked by MeidasTouch.
Annnnnnd there it is, folks. This is how he worms out of this situation.
Is this person verifiably their cousin?not likely.
Doesn't need to be their actual cousin. All it takes is some greased palms and fudged paperwork, and anyone could be related to one of the jurors. Given all his trump bullshit, I would not put it past him and his cult of cronies to do that or something similar.