this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
55 points (69.5% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3072 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 5 months ago (14 children)

Remember this one random dude you guys used to talk about like 10 years ago? You should vote for me because I’ll free him!

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 months ago (15 children)

After 8 yrs of this nonsense, I'm floored anyone still takes what Trump says seriously.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 5 months ago

His word is demonstrably worthless.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Dude was a criminal, rightfully convicted. So of course Trump would pardon him.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

He didn't know who he was 30 hours ago - now it's between Ulbricht and Rittenhouse for VP....

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

Don't forget the corpse of Noem's dead dog. Trump has seen him in the news a lot too.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Did he do something morally wrong? I'm confused by your statement if you're only referring to creation/management of silk road. Heard some accusations about him being involved in murder-for-hire but I didn't think that was ever substantiated

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

He kinda tried to have an imaginary person taken out...that's what got him.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

He facilitated the sale of many dangerous drugs and weapons. You cant run a website without rules and claim ignorance. In the same vein, I think the Purdue family and executives of that company deserve to be in jail for life as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It definitely had rules. Purdue pushed drugs on people while misinforming them and doctors, and did kickbacks and all other sorts of corruption. Weapon sales I'm kinda mixed on, probably not the best idea. But absolutely fuck off with that drug war bullshit. If people want to buy drugs and overdose on them they should be free to do so. Drugs aren't dangerous, lack of information is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Unenforced rules aren't the same. I know there are libertarians that think his incarceration was unjustified but they ignore all the bad things silk road did. And drugs are definitely dangerous. Back then you could get anything, there were listings for black market weapons. Don't try to gaslight me or the rest of Lemmy by trying to make this man a martyr. There are actually innocent people in jail now that need the attention more.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I would argue that attempting to have someone murdered is morally wrong.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm really just wondering if that actually happened though. I don't see any charges related to that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Because it never happened. The only charges ever brought on the topic were dismissed with prejudice.

It was just another lie and corrupt thing done like his entire case is littered with.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This doesn't make sense to me. Is someone paying Donald to do this? It's just what he believes libertarians want to hear, he won't do it unless he is being paid for pardons.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There have been multiple articles that you could get a pardon for 2 million USD. That's the previous time he was president.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Yep! That's what I am basing my thoughts on. Donald won't do shit unless there is some sort of short-term profit or ego soothe.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago

So.... What happened to commuting his sentence in the first term? Too much golf, I guess

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Seems like you like trump and are here to create division. And it looks like you're not an American by your comment "That's cute, Americans talking about privilege while their military industrial complex wages forever wars and their financial imperialism squeezes the entire world."

So I'm going to tag your username with something terrible I'm not going to quote here and block your posts so I don't have to see your divisive bullshit on here anymore.

Reading through the comments it's clear that you're the one bad at this.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Here is a short politico article:

Trump pledges to commute sentence of Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht if elected [Peder Schaefer | 05/25/2024 | Politico] https://www.politico.com/news/2024/05/25/trump-commute-ross-ulbricht-sentence-libertarian-convention-00160025

“And if you vote for me, on Day One, I will commute the sentence of Ross Ulbricht,” the former president said, generating cheers from the audience, moments after mentioning his plans to pardon supporters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

“It’s one of the things we wanted from his first term,” said Katherine Yeniscavich, a national committee member of the party.

Ulbricht has been imprisoned since 2013, and some libertarians say his case is an example of government overreach and the need for criminal justice reforms. Ulbricht’s case was one of the top issues that libertarians asked Trump to address before the convention — and it won Trump his biggest applause of the night.

In another olive branch to the third-party, Trump said he would put a Libertarian in his cabinet if elected, and would also place Libertarians in “senior posts” in his administration.

But despite those promises, Trump received sustained boos and jeers from the crowd throughout his speech, suggesting the pledge to pardon Ulbricht may not be enough.


Edit: added info below

The Hill article, short paragraph on Ross:

Trump draws mixed reactions as he urges Libertarians ‘combine with us’ [Julia Mueller | 05/25/24 | The Hill] https://thehill.com/homenews/4686347-trump-draws-mixed-reactions-as-he-urges-libertarians-combine-with-us/

As part of his appeal to the party, Trump also committed to putting a Libertarian in his Cabinet if he wins the Oval Office in 2024 — and to commute the sentence of Ross Ulbricht, who is serving life in prison for his role in operating a platform for buying and selling illegal drugs. Chants of “free Ross” had erupted several times throughout the night’s events.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Ross Ulbricht the six fold murder for hire client

load more comments
view more: next ›