this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
54 points (98.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35694 readers
1144 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Isn't this a very common phrase? Surely, someone already thought about this?

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

The same way they got "meta": money.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Considering it was registered in 1995 (https://www.whois.com/whois/threads.com) you are correct in thinking that it should have already been registered.

However you can sell (transfer) a domain to others if you wish, which is probably what meta did.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You just know someone bought that domain hoping to turn it into a gangbusters online clothes retailer and the best they could manage to do is camp on it and sell it.

Could’ve been Bezos, instead was a bozo.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Were they a bozo, though? If they sold that domain to FB, there is a great chance they just banked like gangbusters.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I suppose it depends on your outlook. I’d rather have had the passive income over time paid in stock options that multiply in value that I can get interest free loans against to file tax losses than the one time payout you have to pay gains on.

Hindsight is 20/20

Edit to add: there’s also a non zero chance that Meta swooped in like Disney did to Central Florida, set up a secret shell company to buy the property under value so no one knows what big business is behind the acquisition.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Honestly, chances are godaddy sold it to them for a few hundred bucks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you're interested, you can see the past snapshots of thread.net in the wayback machine. This one from 2016: https://web.archive.org/web/20160111175229/http://thread.net/

Old primary word domains like this can cost millions to acquire.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Isn't this something else though? Meta's is .net isn't it? So even they couldn't get the .com...

edit: Indeed it's nothing to do with Meta, though it seems kinda related. Bit surprised Meta went with the name actually.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

ah ye are right, I briefly checked out .com and it seemed to roughly match

.net was registered in 1997 so the same roughly still applies

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Yeah, and if they could stop using established terms for their BS like "Metaverse" that would be great.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

How does Microsoft justify having apps called "Teams" and "Code"?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Meta is a stupid name. So is threads.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It seems that before Instagram's Threads was launched, threads.net was just a domain name parked for sale with GoDaddy's domain auction service Afternic: https://web.archive.org/web/20221115220239/http://threads.net/

So I guess Meta just paid whatever they were asking to be paid?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least they're willing to use their buttload of money acquire the domain, unlike Nissan and what they did to nissan.com owner.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could you elaborate, please?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nissan Motors v. Nissan Computer

In 1980, Uzi Nissan founded Nissan Foreign Car, an automobile service, in Raleigh, North Carolina.[9][10] In 1987, Uzi Nissan founded Nissan International, Ltd, an import/export company that traded primarily in heavy equipment and computers.[11] On 14 May 1991, Uzi Nissan founded Nissan Computer Corporation, which provides sales and service of personal computers, servers, and computer parts, as well as internet hosting and development. Nissan Computer registered nissan.com for its use on 4 June 1994, five years prior to Nissan Motor Corporation's interest in the domain.[10][2]

Nissan Motors considered Nissan Computer's use of the name to be trademark dilution, and laid claim to the domain by alleging cyber squatting. However, Nissan Computer was named after its owner, Uzi Nissan.[13][14][15] Following the outcome of the case, Nissan Motors uses the name nissanusa.com for its U.S. website.

Uzi Nissan died in 2020 due to covid and the website is now no more, but it used to contains his account abut Nissan suing him for the domain and he spent years and about a million dollar to defend himself. He won and Nissan was ordered to pay $50,000 for his trouble, so he was furious. More details can be found in the internet archive snapshot: https://web.archive.org/web/20190608101443/https://www.digest.com/Big_Story.php

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Interesting

Why the hell washe not awarded his whole fees? Maybe the jury didn't think he'd been spending that much money? Well what an annoying outcome.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't understand something else - why every article say that threads us a Twitter rival if meta themselves say it's a slack competitor and it's an exact copy of slack

Edit: oh OK that's what op was talking about. Turns out there's already an app called thread which is slack copycat and was created before meta's threads lmao what a shitshow

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They just have the .net though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, and if they could stop using established terms for their BS like "Metaverse" that would be great.

load more comments
view more: next ›