this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1238 readers
65 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.


New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide


Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.


Community Spotlight

Featured Posts and User Investigations


Useful Links


Community Rules


Other Communities

[email protected]


If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

From the video description:

Chris Sharp of The Liberation Times, @liberationtimes,   will release new news on the UFOs that swarmed Langley Air Force Base Virginia in December 2023 on May 11th at 12 Noon Pacific. We will cover this breaking story, but that's not all, Jonathan Butner is here with us, live, to discuss the UFO / UAP event he witnessed over Langley and the videos of the UAPs / UFOs that The United States Air Force is blaming on drones that forced the relocation of the Langley F-22 fighter wing.  Our friend Ross Coulthart from @NewsNation covered this event recently on his show Reality Check.  Members of Congress are asking questions while The Pentagon and The United States Air Force continue to cover up the event.

That's from Matt Ford's "The Good Trouble Show."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think events like the UAP over Langley AFB and the UAP engaged by military over North America last year should have more coverage than they've had. There is a clear presence of objects of unknown origin that even our own military is concerned about. It should be an issue that bridges beliefs of what the objects are and where they come from. Whether they're drones, NHI, or you name it, there is something engaging military bases and even interrupting military exercises. Unfortunately, the stigma on this subject can easily silence the news.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Of course. The media is willfully ignoring this issue because of a) the potential for ontological upset, and b) no profit-oriented upside. Most of the MSM is owned by one of the 6 giant corporations. For these people the status quo has worked phenomenally well. The UFO issue threatens to destabilize the status quo. For those who are hanging onto the status quo with a white-knuckled grip, the UFO issue is a huge risk at best, and an apocalypse at the worst.

Thanks to the efforts of a lot of people on the ground and also inside the deep state, the issue is no longer possible to ignore. But the MSM likely will do absolute minimum for the disclosure. So the MSM isn't going to and cannot completely ignore this issue. The MSM will participate conservatively in order to continue to attempt narrative control.

So if disclosure is unavoidable (pssst: it is in fact unavoidable), the billionaires and their minions will spin the disclosure in the least damaging, least disruptive for them way. But of course they will also pretend nothing is going on as long as possible because they serve their own interests, not mine or yours. They wanna keep things stable and same-y. It's pretty simple.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wish we had an active UAP group on lemmy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I agree. There are a few semi-regulars on here, though it definitely pales compared to a certain other platform. Lemmy is a great site, but niche communities can have trouble taking off. I try to keep an eye out for news or informative articles to post and occasionally those posts take off. UAP is a topic that has a lot of interest, but getting user engagement is a different story.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't have time for a 2+ hour video, is there a "good parts" version?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Not that I know of. Matt might make one or more short clips from it later.

The most interesting part is the witness interview in the middle of the video. And there are two long righteous rants on the either end of the video.