144
At this rate in a couple years there'll be nothing left of all those studios they bought recently.
this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
144 points (98.6% liked)
Games
32549 readers
1721 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
That’s by design. Force your opposition to sell, bankrupt them and write off the loses. Shrink the industry and force players to sign up for your subscription services.
I’m not a fan, but it’s hard to see this wasn’t their plan from the get go
The industry historically hasn't shrunk when studios close like this. There just ends up being more bespoke studios all over the world with former developers from those studios.
It seems weird for a platform holder to do this.
They also now own all of the IP those studios created.
They don't care about being a platform holder
I guess you can do that when you own Windows.
kinda hard to make video games if you keep laying off the people who make video games...
my heart goes out to those in the industry going through all this crap, man
In just four months, they have lost Toys for Bob (developer of Spyro Reignited and Crash 4), Arkane Austin (Prey 2017), and Tango (Evil Within, Hi-Fi Rush). I wish I had the money to casually buy some great dev studios, including the makers of a GOTY contender, and casually kill them off a few years later.
I know they are in panic mode right now, but I honestly don't know what their plan is at this point. I doubt even they know. Watching the situation from the outside, it's almost comical how MS has mismanaged everything for years. I live in Europe and I've never seen Xbox marketed anywhere. GamePass is supposedly their priority, and barely anyone I know who is interested in gaming knows that it even exists. The whole deal with the service was delivering first party games day one, yet failed to deliver anything worth buying four years into the new generation, while most of what they actually released was already in the works prior the acquisition. They bought dozens of studios, and mismanaged every single one of them. Fuck, they couldn't even settle on the cover for their game cases for half a year after their new box released.
The only good thing out of this debacle is that people have finally realized how utterly incompetent Phil Spencer is. I remember the days when fanboys were parroting his lies and kept talking about how "Phil is a gamer just like us", just because he showed on the stage in a shitty t-shirt. Too bad it took xbox fucking dying for them to realize, but I guess it's better later than never.
Did they just want to buy the IPs? Why throw Billions at video game development, only to cut out the development part?
Microsoft has always been more than happy to make the market smaller by buying the competition and discontinuing their products shortly after. For some reason people didn't think Xbox would do the same?
I’m not entirely sure but wasn’t this Bill Gates’s business strategy back in the 90s or so?
Embrace, Extend, Extinguish
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish in 1998, Bill Gates stated: "One thing we have got to change in our strategy – allowing Office documents to be rendered very well by other people's browsers is one of the most destructive things we could do to the company. We have to stop putting any effort into this and make sure that Office documents very well depends on PROPRIETARY IE capabilities. Anything else is suicide for our platform. This is a case where Office has to avoid doing something to destory [sic] Windows."
Not just Gates, but all higher ups at Microsoft think this way. It's kind of naive to think Xbox would be different IMHO.
One could argue to get exclusivity of said IPs for their subscription service. They haven't pulled the trigger yet, it's possible they have aborted the plan entirely. I wonder if they even know what they're doing.
Its almost like none of you remember microsoft in the dot com era.
Did no one just intuitely understand this was going to be a consequence of aquiring blizzard-activision?
In other news trees of green
Trees of green what, is the real question.