134
So he's effectively been found innocent. If he was a normal person he might be stuck in jail until the trial resumes but since he's rich this is functionally the same as being found innocent.
Oh he's guilty as sin. The problem is that the entire "free world" is actually just corporatocracies ruled by the top < 0.1% of wealthy individuals, their corporations, and lobby groups — each masquerading as "democracies" but 90-99% of their policy, legislation, and regulation is auctioned off to the highest bidder(s).
I’m starting to wonder at which point the incredibly obvious and blatant bias and corruption with which Cannon is running this clown show is going to precipitate the appellate court to remove her from the case. Because if they don’t, I’m going to start wondering when it’s going to precipitate an assassination attempt on her.
I’m starting to wonder at which point the incredibly obvious and blatant bias and corruption with which Cannon is running this clown show is going to precipitate the appellate court to remove her from the case.
Keep in mind that Clarence Thomas oversees the 11th circuit. Even if the appeals court removes her, that only means that the Supreme Court would step in because of course they would and once again save Trump. At worst, the entire thing is an exercise in futility, and at best you'd be talking about delays that would likely push the trial back most likely into 2026 at the earliest by the time all the dust settles. Either way, Trump wins. The only question is how much.
Wonder how big her check was
From what I saw reported in corruption cases, might not be that much. Unfortunately the amount can be pretty low, e.g. 22k USD.
Depends. What's the going rate on a promise of a future Supreme Court seat?
This was expected.
But for me, it's insane that Smith refused to take any action. It's not like he has anything to lose by trying to get her removed at this point.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The order from U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon had been expected in light of still-unresolved issues in the case and because Trump is currently on trial in a separate case in Manhattan charging him in connection with hush money payments during the 2016 presidential election.
Cannon said in a five-page order Tuesday that it would be “imprudent” to finalize a new trial date now, casting further doubt on federal prosecutors’ ability to bring Trump to trial before the November presidential election.
Trump faces dozens of felony counts accusing him of illegally hoarding at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida classified documents that he took with him after he left the White House in 2021, and then obstructing the FBI’s efforts to get them back.
Trump faces four criminal cases as he seeks to reclaim the White House, but outside of the New York prosecution, it’s not clear that any of the other three will reach trial before the election.
The Supreme Court is weighing Trump’s arguments that he is immune from federal prosecution in a separate case from special counsel Jack Smith charging him with plotting to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
Prosecutors in Fulton County, Georgia have also brought a separate case related to election subversion, though it’s not clear when that might reach trial.
The original article contains 272 words, the summary contains 217 words. Saved 20%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
134 points (97.9% liked)
politics
18881 readers
3594 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS