50
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago

Glad to see Comac planes being used at production scale. Hopefully they are safe and push Boeing to do better, but based on recent US actions I bet they will ban Comac to prevent competition.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Locally produced, artisanal airplanes.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Boeing has generally been one of the lynchpins of China-US trade relationship, and with both the current geopolitical climate and the ongoing quality issues of Boeing aircrafts, of course the Chinese airlines would want to hedge their bets and take a risk on domestically produced jets, even if it is new and relatively unproven at this point. It doesn't mean that they will stop buying from Airbus or Boeing completely, though.

The C919 uses many American/European produced components/subsystem, most notably the CFM LEAP engines, which is also used by both Airbus and Boeing.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

There is more that goes into an airplane than the people maintaining or assembling it, which can and does go afoul. There is the entire manufacturing process, how materials are sourced, processed, refined, machined/formed, heat treated, stress relieved, coated/plated, assembled, and the list goes on. That is a major factor why aircraft are so safe and if you think China's material and process controls are as rigorous as someone like Boeing or Airbus, it isn't. It has taken decades of actual aircraft manufacturing to get the formula right for those respective companies and they continue to evolve as time goes on and new information is learned.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

someone like Boeing

U funny

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

and if you think China's material and process controls are as rigorous as someone like Boeing or Airbus, it isn't

Source? You can probably point to specific processes that are done better in the US/Europe. But which ones are preventing China from building a reliable plane?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Nothing but time. So long as their testing is rigorous, they will catch up to Boeing... But will they be rigorous? History has repeatedly suggested, no.

But we in the west shouldn't count on that continually being the case.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

We tested Comac parts for FAA certification. When you've tested parts for decades you can pretty much nail down the cause of the failure be it design, process, materials, a combination and so forth.

Also the c919 is only certified in China. It can't fly in the US or Europe.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 3 weeks ago

That which made China will also be its downfall. They can’t manufacture and sell cheap junk for decades, then turn around and expect people to trust their lives in their planes.

Boeing isn’t better, by any means. Nationalize them and imprison the CEOs

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Were you hibernating in the last 25 years?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Prolly a boomer... They are stil see the world as if it is 1990s lol

[-] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago

They are know how to form a proper sentence.

[-] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago

Does working 14 hour days count as hibernation?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

100 planes isn't a whole lot for the Chinese domestic market. And they won't mind that the planes are made in China at all.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

imprison the CEOs

a broken clock is right once a day

this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
50 points (94.6% liked)

World News

31101 readers
1993 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS