United Kingdom

First of all, why would government websites have ads?

Military and intelligence services are bothered by China. The government not so much. The conservatives are happy to sell our nuclear and communication infrastructure to China. It was the backlash in the media that made them change course.

The British government agreed to allow China to work on nuclear power stations in the UK, it was the intelligence service that made them reduce Chinas access to its design and operation.

This is the same government that stopped the EU from restricting cheap Chinese steel into the EU (prior to Brexit). Recently the UK closed one of its major steel manufacturers. We can only recycle steel in the UK now.

Steels needed for boats and tanks. Especially if a land war in Europe broke out, or a naval war in the Pacific.

The conservatives are weak on all advertising. The shear amount of gambling adverts in the UK are abysmal. As well as direct marketing to children for high strength vapes. We nearly got rid of nicotine addiction in young people, it's was falling significantly prior to vapes being allowed to advertise to children. They don't care, they'll sell anything to the highest bidder.

“The government” is a diverse thing look at the examples given in the article

• Transport for London
• Derbyshire Dales District Council
• Walsall Council
• The Met Office

I rather doubt Chinese banner ad brokers are at the top of Derbyshire council’s agenda

including an ad-tech biz in China involved in past privacy controversies

various advertising exchanges and resellers ranging from Google (like what El Reg uses) to one in China.

Do they think google hasn't been involved in privacy controversies?

Governments are often made up of more than one person, and the people often have thoughts and priorities that don't completely line up all in a row.

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Exclusive At least 18 public-sector websites in the UK and US send visitor data in some form to various web advertising brokers – including an ad-tech biz in China involved in past privacy controversies, a security firm claims.

Silent Push's report identifies four .gov sites that, in our experience, do not display adverts though do ping web ad platforms, do list various exchanges in their ads.txt files, and may break US government CISA rules.

"So these organizations don't all immediately get JavaScript access to drop on the page but they do get payloads from the bid stream – and by default it includes sensitive fields, like the device IP address.

There are settings that publishers can toggle on to limit some of the personal data from being shared via the bid stream, but there's no indication this is on for these UK sites – especially based on the significant number of vendors that are authorized by the domains."

"The JavaScript of [tracking] pixels captures similar data that the JavaScript of real-time bidding endpoints collects, with the core difference being that pixels can set a cookie on your browser immediately, whereas in ad tech the thousands or tens of thousands of entities with opportunities to bid don't get an opportunity to put a cookie on your computer unless they win an auction – and then only through approved attribution vendors," he explained.

"We take these matters very seriously, and after looking into this in some detail with the team, we have never had any ad quality issues with Yeahmobi in the past, nor are we aware of any Chinese links, but as a precaution we are in the process of removing them from all our publisher ads.txt files until further notice.

The original article contains 1,311 words, the summary contains 290 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!