That was interesting as fuck. Sad I had to go to reddit to read it, but what a crock of shit Samsung.
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2023
9 points (84.6% liked)
Technology
34745 readers
152 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Of course they do, no matter how good the physical camera and lenses get (and they have improved a lot in the last 10 years) you still cant fight physics, the size of the parts in a phone camera mean you are always working near, or well past the diffraction limit so there is a physical limit on the detail they can render, no matter how many megapixel you throw at it..
The average phone buyer doesn't give a shit how much AI enhancement is going on in their photos, if on average their photos look better, they will buy it regardless of whether it's "real" or not. honestly this isn't really much different to any photo you take on a modern phone, they already use AI enhancement for texture recovery, sharpening, face and subject detection, "cosmetic smoothing", etc.. etc.. etc..
They do say they are using AI enhancement so they aren't really lying.. at least not in the legal sense. People that actually want to take photos of the moon will still use real cameras.
Edit: oops lemmys doing the old posts on front page thing again lol.