A UK based place for bicycle commuters, adventures, fixers of eBay treasures and everything else that the UCI hates. Give it to us raw and wriggly, you can keep nasty ol strava's
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
You don't have to be in the UK, it's just where the instance lives and the mod is a brit.
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here. No porn. No Ads / Spamming. No one cares about your onlyfans
Respect privacy: Don't share your or anyone else's personal information, such as home addresses, phone numbers, or social security numbers. This is a matter of safety and privacy.
Engage don't rage share opinions discuss disagreements but remain respectful and progressive when doing so. Don't just hit down or post a low effort response.
Have fun, hopefully this community will grow to represent the more chill alt side of cycling.
Feddit.UK rules:
Until posts start coming organically I'll keep posting things, usually going to be rando photos,youtube vids and such. So please feel free to post.
The bicycle company lobby being luddites is entirely unsurprising.
The current 250w is less than a human cyclist can produce. We allow horses on our roads that can produce over 10,000w, without a MOT or licence, but only rich people ride those so I suppose that's okay.
I'm sure it's not entirely the same in the UK, but in the US, it's often mamils that are most opposed to better bike infrastructure and accessibility. Some of the original major opponents to bike paths here were guys who didn't think they could bike as fast as they wanted on dedicated bike lanes, and they thought that having bike lanes would disallow them from using roads.
I think it's the same going on now. Weekend warrior lycra guys trying to prevent the masses from clogging their transportation infrastructure.
Amps are far more important to the UK than top speed, 250w is great for Norfolk, but I imagine people in Sheffield would disagree. Whilst I don't use a throttle on mine there's been times I could have used one, esp when getting a leg injury from mad hill climbs on my commute so I would imagine someone with a chronic issue this would be a game changer getting out the house doing daily tasks etc. Shame that two bodies that should be championing more people on bikes are fighting it. It won't stop kids on Surons wheeling into prams, but it will leave bikes in the shop/garage.
a bit more power will really help to update on cargo bikes i think
I don't get ebikes with throttles. It's basically moped at that point
Now I don't agree that mopeds should be so heavily regulated but basically it falls into the same category, only that one is powered with electricity and other is ice
with the limted top speed and weight diffrence mopeds are still much more dangerous than a twist and go e-bike
I guess London is not going to feel any difference - every other ebike is already run on a throttle and 5-600W motors. Cat's out of the bag at this point, I suppose, but it really pisses me off when they're whizzing around at silly speeds looking down at their damn phones.
Better on a bike than in a larger vehicle.
Huh? This is such a useless comment. Says nothing and yet creates an excuse for idiots.
Murder is also better than mass-murder, yet I don't think anyone would ever use such statement to justify it.
As an ebike user, I'd rather they legalise e-scooters with similar regulations, especially around battery safety. I had one and loved it for certain journeys, as I love my bike for other journeys. Wish I could legally buy one I can trust.
I sort of agree that cycle infrastructure improvements are much more important than these proposals but I don't see how you should block these as it's not exactly like the government needs to spend much to do this, so it's not reducing the money for infrastructure so why not do both.