this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
44 points (95.8% liked)

Linus Tech Tips

3789 readers
1 users here now

~~⚠️ De-clickbait-ify the youtube titles or your post will be removed!~~

~~Floatplane titles are perfectly fine.~~

~~LTT/LMG community. Brought to you by ******... Actually, no, not this time. This time it's brought to you by Lemmy, the open communities and free and open source software!~~

~~If you post videos from Youtube/LTT, please please un-clickbait the titles. (You can use the title from https://nitter.net/LTTtranslator/ but it doesn't seem to have been updated in quite some while...)~~

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's been 8 months since a investigation was called to look into the allegations. Is there anything published? Do we have any estimate to when it'll be published?

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I personally don't think we're getting anything. I always saw the "it takes time" point as a way to duck the issue until the community would forget about it entirely.

So, all in all, if you really want to get some answers, maybe wait enough time to give LMG more than enough time to investigate; so much so that using the "this wasn't a reasonable amount of time" defence strategy would be impossible, and then try to get the community to care again. And ask for answers. I personally do not see this happening, ever, but I hope I'm wrong.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I mean, if it really has been 8 months of radio silence, that's plenty bad already in my opinion. Even if they have no results yet, they're a media company, they should provide as much transparency about the process as possible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In sentiment sure but this is about serious personal matters. The radio silence is also there to shield Maddison who may feel prompted to publicly respond towards ltts public updates.

Her lawyers should be calling ltt for updates but we are just bystanders.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Her lawyers

That's assuming she can hire any. Her case is far from clear cut, I'm not convinced anyone would take her case for a proportion of a potential settlement.

She probably has no recourse.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

I think you're expecting something that is unlikely to happen - there's a bunch of privacy related issues, employment law restrictions etc that potentially mean they will never comment further on it.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 7 months ago

We have moved on