Why is this a bad thing? Should we just knock down a perfectly good building and rebuild one for the sake of it? If a building is in good shape then what's the problem
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
33 points (92.3% liked)
United Kingdom
4065 readers
126 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The poor state of the buildings that aren't maintained is a bad thing. We can all agree on that.
The fact that buildings existed before the NHS existed is the type of click bait headline that the guardian chooses to present for the story. It's just designed to rile people up.
Yeah. Like I sometimes have to work in a building from the Victorian times and there's absolutely nothing wrong with it apart from the kitchen being a bit cold
Flax_vert cooks pot noodle in dangerously cold kitchen due to government cut backs. Minister blames immigration.
The guardian.... probably.
🤣
They're probably in a better state than all the shoddy later builds with RAAC roofs.
LOL that headline. Only the guardian would be so bold.
I bet they'd never print:
Over 30 million buildings older than the EU itself, research finds.
🤣🤣
I found out the other day that the hospital I was born in was torn down a few years ago and replaced with a fresh new building.
I’m only 43. I feel ancient now.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Millions of patients are being put at risk in crumbling hospitals that are unfit for purpose, MPs have said, as figures reveal more than 2,000 NHS buildings are older than the health service itself.
Health bosses have repeatedly warned ministers of the urgent need to plough cash into replacing rundown buildings in order to protect the safety of patients and staff.
Last month it was reported that the ceiling of an intensive care ward collapsed on to a patient on life support and a falling lift broke a doctor’s leg.
The Liberal Democrats’ health and social care spokesperson, Daisy Cooper, described the situation as a “national scandal”, with millions of people “treated in old and crumbling hospitals that are no longer fit for purpose”.
“But instead this government has shamefully chosen to raid capital budgets for fixing crumbling buildings to plug the gap in day-to-day costs, while hospitals are literally falling apart.
Hospital bosses are having to spend millions of pounds on pest control after discovering lice, flies and rodents in children’s wards, breast clinics, maternity units, A&E departments and kitchens.
The original article contains 567 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
I’m really confused why Derriford Hospital, which was built in the ‘80s, is the title picture. I mean, it is grim, but that’s beside the point.