this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
517 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4799 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

NbcNews

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 97 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The only conceivable reason not to declassify the docs this old is embarrassment. There should be an automatic sunset for classified docs.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There's certain secrets which can never be revealed.

Imagine if America somehow caused the death of Queen Elizabeth ( as far as I know there's no evidence of this just an example.) It would take centuries for it be ok to reveal this with out ruining American English relations. This is intended as just a thought experiment to see how bad a country would take it.

And if you think "Nah they don't have anything that bad." The way America has fucked over the world with it's KNOWN foreign policy... there's 0 chance that we don't have many many many skeletons in our closet. I guarantee we've assassinated people. Potentially Leaders (no matter what Carter said). I guarantee we've interfered with elections, or even fully rigged elections. We've probably handed over dangerous weapons to countries. We've almost certainly done devastating things to multiple people in the world.

And think of everything we've done to our own people. Just think of what we HAVE admitted. The Tuskegee Experiments? That's what we HAVE admitted to. I'm guarantee as well that's not the worst thing our government has done to their own citizens. I mean imagine if we find out the FBI threatened the president, or actually did kill Kennedy or even just any involvement in that? Holy shit, there's "Think something happened" And there's "Know something happened"... that's not getting revealed.

Should we have an automatic sunset for classified documents? Sure. Should we stop doing awful shit? Yes. But my god, the amount of skeletons in our closet and what will happen when it's all out in the open.... it won't be released. Hell I'm willing to bet there's thing that aren't even shared with the president (Maybe because he doesn't know what to ask for or they flat out wouldn't share it with him. There are limitations to what is shared with a president, for instance an investigation into him.)

Or maybe all classified documents will accidentally be destroyed in a fire the day before they're to be released. OOPS!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

with out ruining American English relations

Those relations should be ruined if that happened.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

In terms of superpowers messing up the world with foreign policy- compared to European/Soviet colonialism the US and China have both done well.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

so basically what you’re saying is they should be able to act with impunity no matter what? how about responsibility?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nice strawman. The gist of their entire comment was summed up nicely when they stated "it won't be released"

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

There is. It's 25 years, unless it falls under some exception.

https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/auto-declass-exemptions.html

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

or maybe they can’t declassify the documents because they’re all still at trumps house

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Actually I heard Biden can still declassify them in his mind and it counts

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Much of what is classified is not even classified for political motives but instead because its cheaper and easier to leave something classified. Furthermore, you're not likely to get punished for not declassifying.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Democratic congresswoman from New York is part of a delegation of lawmakers who traveled to the capital of Santiago ahead of the 50th anniversary of the coup against President Salvador Allende on Sept. 11, 1973.

The goal of the trip was to “start to change … the relationships between the United States and Chile and the region, Latin America as a whole,” Ocasio-Cortez said outside the Museum of Memory and Human Rights that remembers the victims of the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet, who ruled from 1973 to 1990.

Ocasio-Cortez said she has introduced legislation to declassify documents related to Chile’s coup and Vallejo said a similar request had been made by the Chilean government.

U.S. Rep. Greg Casar, a Democrat from Texas, said after the delegation’s approximately hourlong visit to the museum in Santiago that it was important to recognize the “truth” that “the United States was involved with the dictatorship and the coup.”

U.S. Rep. Joaquin Castro from Texas said the visit to the museum was a reminder that it was important “to make sure that a tragedy and a horror like this never, ever happens again in Chile or in Latin America or anywhere else around the world.”

Reps. Nydia Velázquez of New York and Maxwell Frost of Florida also traveled to South America as part of the delegation sponsored by the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a Washington-based think tank.


The original article contains 472 words, the summary contains 235 words. Saved 50%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Thanks bot.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

CIA has her come in. Shows her the documents she walks out and god "NEVER MIND!" and quickly walks away afraid of what she just has seen. A joke... but probably also completely true.

On the other hand it's completely possible the CIA doesn't have any documents on their role in the Chilean Coup in 1973.... because they chose not to write anything down. (or theirs was planned for 1974)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think there's any mystery about what happened. But ya, I doubt they wrote it down.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I was more making a joke.

I'm sure we know the truth, there's supposed to be a page that's fully redacted from a couple days before. Wonder why that's never been shown if there's nothing to hide. Then again there's knowing what happened, and having proof of it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Chile was a canon event. CyberSyn could’ve charted a path away from Climate change. Sigh 😞

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In Chile, the U.S. government tried to pacify the country village by village using the Strategic Hamlet Program, basically creating villages where there was no or little socialist influence.

They tried more extreme experiments where they completely isolated villages or groups of villages, allowing absolutely nobody to enter or exit for periods of up to four years.

In some of the villages, people simply starved to death.

In other, more self sufficient villages, the people managed to scrape by.

It was noted that in many of the villages where this technique was tried, messianic or millenarian movements sprang up.

In 16 separate incidences, villages were able to independently invent "flesh interfaces" and "non-electrical portals", and it was surmised that these villages were being collectively dosed with LSD for long periods of time, and their intellectual mutations allowed for these 'advances'.

The flesh interfaces were eventually destroyed by Pinochet's troops at a terrible cost in lives.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

super sad story...

but those last two parapgraphs confuse the hell out of me... i tried searching to understand and am much more confused... eli5?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That's not from OP's linked story. I have no idea where it's from.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What's the point? Those responsible politicians and their mass murdering buddies are either dead or way above the law. The public which could and should learn something from this are currently too busy masturbating to war footage and news from Ukraine.

We all already know what the US did in Latin America (and still does)... no need to read something War Criminals didn't want you to read for 50 years... shove those documents up your ass CIA.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

an open, honest government where the declassification of documents is possible and even normalised regardless of how damaging they are for the image of said government is still beneficial for all of us

also, reiterating and proving commonly held beliefs is still beneficial for all of us, same way that actually researching things that everyone already thinks are true is still good

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

An open and honest government wouldn't have a need to classify documents... an open and honest government wouldn't wait 50 years to declassify those same documents. Nothing open or honest about this government either way... These documents are written by the perpetrators anyway...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

thats all true to a point, but i still dont see any of it as a reason to actively argue against improvement