Who cares what FOP wants...they only serve to enable further erosion of our rights and allowing police to suffer 0 consequences when the over react and curb stomp innocent folks. Or let them no knock raid the wrong house......or prevents disciplinary records from following shit cops from job to job.
this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
3 points (80.0% liked)
Indiana
390 readers
2 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I haven't often heard Hogsett and the FOP be on the same side of an argument.
What are people's views on judges having the (usually) sole power in certain circumstances like sentences?
Should they all be elected or appointed, or a mix?
I often have contempt for judges because they have so much power in their special room.
Was this a miscarriage of justice?
I haven't looked at sentencing for similar crimes, but wonder if this was typical for the situation. I know I wouldn't be happy if my wife was killed. No sentence would probably due.
They ruled that he was paranoid and having a psychotic break when he did it so he was probably oversentenced except he killed a cop.
There’s no winning with judges. They should not be elected because they run on being tough on crime, but they shouldn’t be appointed by one individual without confirmation.
Really, if they lessened the time-as-a-lawyer requirements to match the time-as-a-prosecutor requirements(or just as well, maybe better, eliminate the shorter time-as-a-prosecutor option entirelyr, it could do a lot to address this.
As things stand, Prosecutors can run for office as a judge before any but the worst or most open dirt on them has a chance to surface, while already serving in a position that insulates them from consequences. Once they make judge, its a lot harder to hold them accountable.
The judge in the OP? Not part of the problem. Not based on this case anyways.
That time as a lawyer and time as a prosecutor thing you’re mentioning must be very region specific. We don’t have that here. A law school graduate can be appointed. You don’t have to hold a lot agree to be elected judge— my county probate judge is just some random asshole
That's a trial court judge. Apparently in Indiana the requirement for a proper Judicial appointment is 10 years of law practice OR 5 years as a trial court judge. There's all sorts of local and county positions with titles assigned to them which won't hold water anywhere else - not Federally, not the next state over, and often not even in the next county.
Why is nothing about this shit ever taught in school. They basically say there's a Congress and constitution, and that's it.
And now, we make sure not to leave our they all owned slaves, but nothing useful as a society member IMO.
I don't know anything about this stuff
... and its both hilarious and ridiculous. Canada's constitution and parlimentary system are treated as better internationally, partially because there's no right to bear arms enshrined in it, but they went at least as far as the US to wipe out their First Nations(Natives), and the differences are often attributable to inspiration taken from the Iroquois Confederacy(a native federation of allied tribes).
I prefer the option that learned from the peoples that were already here when we showed up. Please and Thankyou.
🐖🪦