this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
-3 points (42.1% liked)

Gun Memes

168 readers
1 users here now

hipoint

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What?

The right to bear arms specifically comes from the 2nd amendment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The legal concept existed for at least a century before the Constitution, as declared in the English Bill of Rights. It certainly was not a new concept at the time of the US Bill of Rights being written.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Think of it this way.

Is it ethical to force someone to be a catholic, or a jew, or an atheist, or a hindu? I think you'll agree it is unethical. Suppose we didn't have the first amendment. Would that suddenly change the morality of forcing someone to practice or not practice a religion? I think we'll both agree it is still not ethical.

So then, the first amendment didn't create a right to freedom of religion. It described a right that already existed. It tries to bring legality in line with morality.

The same is true for the second amendment. Gun ownership isn't ethical because of the second amendment. The second amendment exists because gun ownership is ethical.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you believe self-defense is a natural right of all individuals, then the right to keep and bear arms exists with or without the 2nd Amendment codifying it into law.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Right to self defence isn’t the same as the right to bear arms

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We are a tool-using species. Banning arms infringes on the right to self defense. Just as banning writing implements infringes on the right to free speech.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

Ah you’re just trolling. I see