this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
467 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3150 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

To be fair, I don't think the gag order included attacking the judge

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 166 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Why even issue a gag order that will obviously never be followed if there is no intent to follow through?

[–] farcaster@lemmy.world 130 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They just gotta keep up the illusion of consequences for Trump. Fines (which will never be collected). Gag orders (which will never be enforced). Bans from business and finance dealings (which will be reversed). But hey we're doing something!

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 89 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's infuriating. He gets treated with so much deference and kid gloves, and he's still acting like he's being persecuted. And the worst part is that his base eats it all up.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Someone should sprinkle some drugs on him. Worst case, he has to deal with Eric sniffing him for a day.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

We have a rule against cruel and unusual punishment.

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Just put black ink in his orange spray tan. For one day, maybe he'll be treated like a minority in America. That should terrify him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 10 points 7 months ago

I'm surprised they don't just declare that he paid the fine successfully rather than go through all that trouble to lower it.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's embarrassing at this point. "Don't make your Trumpanzees send death threats to my clerks." Donald makes his Trumpanzees send death threats to the clerks. "Oh, okay, you can post a much smaller bond and have some more time to get the money."

[–] root_beer@midwest.social 3 points 7 months ago

“Ope, jeepers gosh, looks like you’re still having trouble with it, we can setcha up with a ~~zero~~ negative-interest payment plan there so once yer done makin’ those payments, you’ll get a li’l reward to getcha back on yer feet”

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The gag orders lately have been leaving out the judge, prosecutors, and their families. Wouldn't want an appearance of bias. What's a few death threats between friends?

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

As I understand it, it reduces the chances of an appeal if they don't include themselves in the gag order.

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah that's definitely what they're going for. It just seems like a huge overcorrection. There is way too high of a chance that somebody gets killed by one of Trump's supporters. What appeals court is going to throw out a conviction because the judge tried to protect themselves and the prosecution from political violence instigated by the defendant?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I guess if nothing else, it's a paper trail and another thing that can be added to a list.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

They might be waiting for the people to finally do something about it. The government is infiltrated with members who put the well beings of very few over the majority of the people. We are improperly raging against the machine

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 160 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Won't someone rid me of this meddlesome ex-president?

[–] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago (3 children)

His mom should have swallowed instead.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Given the history of the Trumps, I really don't think Fred gave her much choice in the matter.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He’s proof of why abortion should be free and available to all.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago

And sameday.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Someone came in her rubber boot and let the flies do the rest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] casmael@lemm.ee 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You know I’ve decided to like trump. I think I’d like him on the wall best.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Better reinforce it first.

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Oh it’s okay, I’d just like to hang the top. The rest can probably go in the bin.

[–] nuachtan@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

You! Foot warrior. Have these two revoked.

[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 106 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 2 points 7 months ago (6 children)

You miss spelled "Execute".

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fuck everybody downvoting you. Eat the rich

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

He's broke though?

[–] zerog_bandit@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I've been saying it's time to lynch this traitor for years.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 98 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Judge: "Don't do the thing or there will be serious consequences." Trump: Does the thing anyway. Judge: Does nothing. Trump: Smirks.

Judge: "I'm serious this time. Don't do the thing again or there will be serious consequences." Trump: Remembers what happened last time, does the thing again anyway. Judge: Does nothing. Trump: Smirks.

Judge: "I'm super duper serious this time. Don't do the thing again or there will be serious consequences." Trump: Remembers what happened last time, does the thing again anyway, says "what are you going to do about it?". Judge: Backs down, Does nothing. Trump: Smirks.

Judge: "I'm super duper serious this time. Don't do the thing again or there will be serious consequences." Trump: "Fuck off, I'll threaten anyone I want." Judge: Backs down, does nothing, again.

The next judge: "That's it, this is your final warning!" The media: "The courts are sick of this! They'll put a stop to this next time!" Everyone else: Presses X to doubt. Trump: "Fucking lol."

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Seriously. I say again: Trump will die outside of any prison or jailhouse, having never been locked up, likely without even an ankle bracelet, of natural causes, while living a 1% lifestyle.

We should all be dialing back our expectations, fucking dystopian and infuriating as that may be.

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 53 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'd be ok if he went to jail

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Why is this "innocent" man constantly attacking the children of the court staff? Why the children??? Hes pretty consistent about it too which is also strange and extremely dangerous.

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 16 points 7 months ago

Isn't he fantasies about dating his own daughter or something like that?

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Because children can't defend themselves or fight back legally, whereas the judge can. Trump knows the judge has to maintain his veneer of impartiality so he doesn't open Trump to an easy appeal, so he'll threaten and attack the people around him instead. It's the old mob trick of "well gee, if Bobby ain't getting off, well..."

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 14 points 7 months ago

Me reading Trump news

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 36 points 7 months ago

He says as he hasn't been thrown in a hole for doing exactly this, repeatedly.

[–] TechAnon@lemm.ee 27 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If Trump went after my daughter and I were the judge on his case, he'd immediately go to jail and be fined to the maximum extent.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 18 points 7 months ago

Agreed. I admit I may be looking for a reason to justifiably put him on ice for a bit, but I'm astounded at the restraint of a judge when a figure with a history of weaponizing hillbillies targets someone uninvolved in the current case. Even mafia didn't target the innocent relatives of doomed wiseguys.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

There's literally a law for this and he's one of it's proponents, dude cried for years when people even mentioned barons martian looking ass. For real dude looks like a grey in a skin suit and that's coming from a fellow tall lanky white dude.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Jesus Fuck, his Writing really Grates on Me.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

I see What you Did there

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago
[–] bibliotectress@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I tried to read this, but it looks like it's paywalled.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›