this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
79 points (84.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4777 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 63 points 7 months ago

He should take the gig, then during the first veep debate, throw Trump under the bus for an hour as payback for 2016.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Doubt it. He'll go for a woman because Biden has one.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I don't think he could have a woman beside him without immediately denigrating her.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Kari Lake would take it, say thank you, and kiss the hand.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Or trying to grab her by the pussy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

You can hear the first VP debate question... "How did you feel the first time you heard Trump say 'I just grab 'em by the pussy!' ?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

He'll go for a man because he wants people to look "straight out of Central casting." Pretty sure he was told Kristi Noem would be the best choice but he can't abide by a woman in power so he's throwing out ideas where he can still have a not-white-man while still definitely being a man.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

If Trump is considering a home state pick for VP it's a pretty clear sign of his concern.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

He’d get around the same state restriction somehow, because those kinds of rules don’t apply to him apparently.

And frankly this is probably his best option, Rubio has absolutely no spine. He’d happily abide if Trump woke up one day and decided he supported nationwide unrestricted abortion access, and told Rubio to be the face of the policy. This guy would stoop to any low, and toe whatever line Trump throws his lunch at.

There’s also the constant threat of death for whoever he lands on. He did try to have his previous VP killed after all.

~~Edit: there’s no same state restriction for president and vp~~

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There is a restriction, as laid out in the article. FL electors can't vote for a ticket with two Floridians. One of them would have to change residency.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Native Floridian here. I see no downsides to this requirement. Can both go?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The president and vice president can not constitutionally come from the same state. Trump would have to move to pick Rubio.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Snopes rates this claim as Mostly False.

Nothing in the constitution bars presidential and vice-presidential candidates from the same state from running, being elected, or holding office together; it only bars the electors from their home state from voting for both of them.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

Ok but it makes it so that if the election is 270 to 269 electoral votes with the Republicans winning, the VP will be Democratic VP Harris because all 30 Florida electors have to vote for Trump for president so none of them could vote for Rubio, he would get 240 electoral votes and lose to Harris who would get 269.

It's a noteworthy disadvantage even if it's not as bad as I thought originally.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's not that they CAN'T, it's that if they did, the electoral college votes for them from Florida wouldn't count.

This came up as a reading of the 12th Amendment when people were talking about Desantis as a VP pick.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-ron-desantis-running-mate-2024-1721410

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

...

Guys I have an idea for a funny prank

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

I see a foam party coming on!!

load more comments
view more: next ›