this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
703 points (95.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9798 readers
39 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 145 points 1 year ago (64 children)

Here is a Google image of Dodge ram 3500. EVEN IF YOU NEED A CAR, NO ONE NEEDS A VEHICLE THIS BIG.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But how else can you ensure a 100% fatality rate of everything you run over.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And also make sure that you don't have to see the poor people as you run them over.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The issue is not so much size but height. These things are all over where I am as fleet vehicles and even the good ol' type will comment that they can not see anything in front. Just look at the door or normal car in the background of that picture and you get an idea. These hoods are no joke 1.7 meters high for no other reason then to look mean.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

This is a lot of space to tell me what I already know, that driving my Abrams tank is very safe for me and pretty safe for others

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Got me thinking, why don't they put forward facing cameras? Like how we have backup cams.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's wild how there's this kind of evolutionary pressure to turn the grills into ever bigger and more menacing threat displays and it just keeps spiralling out of control because the cars in the rear view mirror only keep getting bigger and more intimidating and you constantly need to buy a new ego prosthetic in the form of a suburban tank like this to keep up with the other drivers that signal "I'M GONNA EAT YOU ALIVE" to you during every commute and grocery run. I'm sure manufacturers love that.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I need a pickup truck for farm work, but I hate how big these things have gotten. I wouldn't buy anything made in the past 20 years. All this height for no practical benefit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

GMC named their bro-dozers AT-4. AT as in anti-tank. They're marketing to the suburban tacticool jackasses. Loud exhaust and parking in crowded bus shelters. Yeah fuck these guys.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But what if you want to run over all your children in one go?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We already have horses for that, and you don't even need to drive them yourself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But I’m a poor, blue collar worker who lives in the country side and need to carry my very heavy tools (6 hammers and a wrench) that a truck from the 2000s cannot handle

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

A used ranger accommodated all of my hauling needs with room to spare when I needed it for work. I drove the company pickup which had the double rear tires once and it was awful and I couldn't recommend it even just for doing pickup truck things.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Look, I'm terribly insecure and fragile. You expect me to drive something reasonable?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

how else are they supposed to haul around their ego?

load more comments (55 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Vehicular manmurder is more like it.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

Driver faces hit-run homicide

The first part of the headline does a fair job of pointing out the murder.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

in case anyone does not want to click the link here is the whole article:

Brian Hammons, 55, faces hit-run and criminally negligent homicide charges.

SALEM, Ore. (KOIN) — A man turned himself into investigators on Sunday after fatally striking a bicyclist on a highway, then leaving the scene, according to Oregon State Police.

Brian Hammons, 55, faces hit-run and criminally negligent homicide charges.

Just after 7 p.m. Saturday, police say they responded to the collision in Marion County on Hwy 64 near milepost 5. According to investigators, the bicyclist, Harley Austin, 42, was riding south in the bike lane on Hwy 164 through the intersection of Talbot Rd SE when Hammons, who was driving a Dodge Ram 3500, turned onto the highway and collided with Austin. New Level 3 ‘Go Now’ evacuations issued for Bedrock Fire

Austin was taken to Salem Hospital, and was later pronounced dead, OSP said.

Authorities allege that Hammons left the scene after the arrival of medical personnel but before law enforcement arrived. He turned himself in the next day and was lodged in the Marion County Jail.

The investigation is ongoing. Any witnesses of the incident are being encouraged to contact OSP, referencing case SP23-252845.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

The article seems fine to me...the title is just a little bit strange probably because they wanted to mention "bike" in it to differentiate it from a crash that doesn't involve a cyclist.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ram 2500 Drivers Have the Most DUIs, More Than Twice the National Average: Report

Roughly 1 in 22 Ram 2500 drivers have been cited with a DUI before, a study claims.

Now back to the story at hand....

Authorities allege that Hammons left the scene after the arrival of medical personnel but before law enforcement arrived. He turned himself in the next day and was lodged in the Marion County Jail.

Hmmmmmmmm, really makes u think

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think you're reaching for something to be angry on this one. I read the title as "[car] crash [involving a] bike". Shorthand is not at all uncommon in headlines, which need to be snappy. They're not trying to frame the incident as caused by the bike or anything.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Exactly. Car crash makes people think of only cars. Bike crash would imply a bike and car.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

They’ve been doing this talking about e-bike fatalities non-stop. “E-bikes are dangerous…. 42 people died on e-bikes…” they cite the statistics, but never mention how many of those people were ran over by assholes who don’t respect the danger of their cars.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not angry at the headline. Just. Not a god damned thing is being done to slow down pedestrian and cyclists death on our streets and roads. Not a thing. All we get is a fucking painted line and hope that some asshole doesn't hit you. Start impounding peoples cars for traffic violations. Increase fines so luxury car drivers think twice about driving on the sidewalk.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly you could do a lot by simply charging people the same as non car related crimes. Like if you or I got pissed/trashed/inebriated and killed a person we would get a totally different outcome if the tool used was a brick or a car.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fines should be based on economic status. A basic fine should be the greater of half a day's pay, or 0.1% of gross wealth before subtracting debt.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

To be fair calling it just a “crash” implies car vs car so calling it a “bike crash” conveys more i formation but makes it seem like only bikes were involved.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Just after 7 p.m. Saturday, police say they responded to the collision in Marion County on Hwy 64 near milepost 5. According to investigators, the bicyclist, Harley Austin, 42, was riding south in the bike lane on Hwy 164 through the intersection of Talbot Rd SE when Hammons, who was driving a Dodge Ram 3500, turned onto the highway and collided with Austin.

Why is there a bike lane on a highway?

To be clear, I'm not taking the side of the driver. Fuck people with unnecessarily huge vehicles. I side with cyclists almost 100% of the time. But this just sounds unsafe.

To me, a highway means speeds in excess of 50mph. That isn't a place where we should have a body unprotected sharing the road.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In some rural areas, the "highway" is literally the only way to get from point A to point B. Many businesses and homes are directly on the highway. It's not the same as Interstate 5 which is a few miles west of there.

Unlike a freeway, which has bigger speed limits, a highway is just any road designed for high traffic. It still has intersections, traffic lights, and driveways into properties.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To me, a highway means speeds in excess of 50mph.

I suppose it's perfectly fine that it means that to you, but US highways run through every little dying town and the speed limits are usually 25-35mph in town, usually for the sole purpose of being a revenue generating speed trap. In fact I just looked it up and this intersection is a school zone with a 20mph speed limit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

usually for the sole purpose of being a revenue generating speed trap. In fact I just looked it up and this intersection is a school zone with a 20mph speed limit.

You think maybe there's other reasons bar revenue traps at play here then?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

least homicidal dodge ram driver

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I am a bit lost, the articles title is "Driver faces hit-run homicide in Marion County bike crash". This seems to not put any blame on the cyclist. It seems much like any time a car hits and kills something, what am I missing?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

curse all these bugs, committing suicide on my windscreen

load more comments
view more: next ›