446
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

A president’s budget proposal is seldom passed into law. Instead, it’s an expression of the priorities the president promises to fight for, often coming on the heels of an agenda laid out in the State of the Union address.

In his recent State of the Union speechPresident Biden  previewed his economically populist priorities when he said “the days of trickle-down economics are over.” 

Trickle-down refers to the idea that tax cuts for the wealthiest “trickle down” to the rest of us. It’s long been a popular idea in Washington, but it’s just not true. A few years ago, the London School of Economics studied 50 years of such “trickle-down” policies in 18 industrialized nations, including the U.S., and found that their only result was increasing the wealth of the already wealthy.

So how do we get prosperity for the rest of us? By taxing extreme wealth and investing those revenues in social goods like education, housing, food and health care. President Biden’s recently released federal budget plan follows that blueprint, putting the value of investing in American families and communities ahead of slashing taxes for the rich.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 152 points 6 months ago

This is good. Increasing corporate taxes means they contribute more to society. They are taxed before they distribute money to shareholders in the form of dividends or buybacks. It encourages them to hire more employees or invest in new technologies.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago

How does it encourage them to hire more employees?

[-] [email protected] 83 points 6 months ago

Employee pay and other expenses back into the company are considered costs and lower their profits. They only pay taxes on profits so if a company reinvests 100% of its profits it can have a very low tax burden.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

When companies re-invest money in their companies instead of paying taxes they build equity. Of course they need workers. That is how FDR made the US a super power almost overnight. The US was industrialized to the max. Then came along Reagan who allowed them to cash out and send jobs overseas.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

To give a simpler answer, not all profit is income. let's say you own a small company and you earned 100k of profit in a year. If you want to take that 100k as income and pay yourself(the owner), you're going to get taxed pretty high. But instead you could really use a new work truck, so you buy a company truck that goes as a business expense and pay yourself the remaining 50k.

Companies have a lot of options in ways to spend their earnings without it having be taxed as income.

[-] [email protected] 63 points 6 months ago

Can't wait for the Republicans to hold the Senate, block every part of this budget and have everyone blame Biden because politics are too complicated.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

More like... Can't wait to continue watching this circus.

[-] [email protected] -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Lol please. Even if Democrats controlled both houses, none of this shit would pass. The president's budget is quite literally propaganda. The article title is fucking ridiculous. None of the Democrats in a position of power have any desire to end trickle down economics. They've all been there for decades and they've had multiple opportunities to do so in that timeframe

Wake the fuck up already, none of these people give a single shit about you. And they haven't since the mid 90s when Democrats adopted "third way" right wing economics.

[-] [email protected] 59 points 6 months ago

I love how we need studies to know that a corporations are greedy and giving them more money means they're just getting more money to give to their shareholdes, no one else 😂

[-] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I hate it too. Its obvious but having the hard facts proven over and over again is a method for beating it into the brains of the populace. Its good that they're doing these studies, its better when they're loud as fuck about the results each time. I'm sure there is plenty overlap between teaching adults and teaching children.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Maybe I'm cynical but I just don't think any amount of facts are going to change the fact that next quarter's earnings report needs to be higher than last quarter.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

It's always worth it to have scientific data backing information that "everyone" already knows.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago

Doesn’t mark the end of shit as long as the GOP controls either chamber of congress or has the presidency.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

That’s cool, though Republicans aren’t giving up on it anytime soon

[-] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Instead, it’s an expression of the priorities the president promises to fight for, often coming on the heels of an agenda laid out in the State of the Union address.

By taxing extreme wealth and investing those revenues in social goods like education, housing, food and health care.

President Biden’s recently released federal budget plan follows that blueprint, putting the value of investing in American families and communities ahead of slashing taxes for the rich.

That’s a $388 billion boost compared to last year’s budget — and it all comes from fairer tax policies targeting wealthy individuals and large corporations.

The Biden budget proposal keeps funding apace with increased need and protects access to fresh fruits and vegetables in the program.

Similarly, the Biden budget would restore the expanded American Rescue Plan Earned IncomeTax Credit for low-income working adults without dependent children.


The original article contains 797 words, the summary contains 138 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Internationally, the US is the main party holding back improved taxation of corporations. In October 2021, the US struck an international deal to revamp global rules on corporate taxation, based on two pillars: getting corporations to pay tax in countries where they do business, and a global minimum corporate tax. Now the US looks set to renege, due to bipartisan opposition in Congress over US multinationals getting taxed overseas.

Even though the Biden administration spearheaded the original deal, they've been MIA getting it ratified. Understandably, other countries worry that the US intends to watch them raise taxes while doing nothing in return. To avoid getting backstabbed, some are looking to impose unilateral digital taxes. And the US has threatened these countries, calling the measures unfair discrimination against US companies.

this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
446 points (96.7% liked)

politics

18904 readers
2983 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS