140
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Propaganda doesn't totally rob people of ~~agency~~ free will (more accurate term), if it did this site wouldn't exist. People do have the capacity to develop critical thinking, skepticism, and a basic curiosity about the world that allow them to develop some resistance to propaganda.

You can hold people accountable for failing to even attempt to do this.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 54 points 6 months ago

I think it would be unwise for this site to start believing that they're all special little geniuses who actually are immune to propaganda because they're just so correct about everything all the time.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

I agree no one is immune to propaganda. That's literally part of this post I made.

But does that mean I have to think someone who literally thinks forest fires are started by Jewish Space Lasers is equally a intelligent and critical as me?

[-] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Considering that the content of this post is tacitly holding ourselves up to be superior to other people, I think it's important to remind that no, actually, we are not so special. Let alone that any of us might have ended up believing very different things, we are all still vulnerable to being misled. Stay humble out there, Hexbear.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

Considering that the content of this post is tacitly holding ourselves up to be superior to other people

You edited your comment so to reply to this part. Are you actually consistent in your life in NOT holding yourself as superior to other people who hold hogwash beliefs? Like if you've ever encountered an antivaxxer or a QAnon supporter, did you view and treat them with the same respect as you would a fellow socialist? Or did you at least hold them in some contempt for their maliciously ignorant beliefs?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

you can think they're a dumb stupid idiot and think they got to being there due to circumstances out of their control at the same time. you're trying to put this all in a neat box when it's actually pretty messy

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

It's not deflection, my post is literally saying we aren't immune to propaganda.

But, also that, not being 100% doesn't really give a free pass for people to repeatedly regurgitate easily debunk-able bullshit multiple times. I don't give Vaush or Destiny or Jordan Peterson fans a pass just because some hypothetical version of myself maybe would have fallen for those hucksters too. If we follow this logic to it's maxim I think you just end up at hard determinism. We can't really judge anyone for anything, that Neo-Nazi only ended up that way cuz his mom made him oatmeal instead of eggs one breakfast and that set off a chain of events that inevitably lead to him reading too much Stonetoss.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

what will our narwhal do and what time will it do it?

[-] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago

The Hexbear pigpoopballs on moscow time.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago

you have material life dice rolls to start even asking questions shrug-outta-hecks

Just as mass propaganda of "everything is going great" hits a wall in the bottom part of society, "the everything is shit" hits similar wall in the owning part of society.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

To repeat something I said elsewhere in this thread, isn't the end logic of this just hard determinism? Can we not judge anyone for anything really cuz we're all just prisoners of our fate?

Also I do have to ask, is everyone really consistent with this whole not feeling superior to people with dumb beliefs? Cuz I don't it based on the content of this site. I'm pretty sure y'all feel superior to any anti-vaxxers you've met in your journeys, as you should because it's a fucking horribly uninformed position with tons of publicly available, easily consumable info debunking it.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Its soft determinism of likelihoods. Historical materialism speaks of classes, millions of people thinking this or that, but that just means 80 percent of them might think something in particular, due to life dice rolls being this or that in certain composition of class relations.

I try not to, i'm a dumbass in lots sorts of things. Anti-vaxxer who masks or lives in rural parts is completely different from anti-vaxxer in restaurant business/healthcare. One is cautious, the other is malicious person, intellect doesn't enter it

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

I try not to, i'm a dumbass in lots sorts of things. Anti-vaxxer who masks or lives in rural parts is completely different from anti-vaxxer in restaurant business/healthcare. One is cautious, the other is malicious person, intellect doesn't enter it

I agree there's mitigating factors, I for example don't really judge people from the developing world as harshly for being behind on certain social issues. I take those into consideration.

And if you really do try I applaud your for you consistency, but I'm suspicious when people on this site make this claim, I mean we literally have a comm called "The Dunk Tank" where we mock people for their stupid beliefs. When someone takes that mockery and tries to apply it more seriously then suddenly we're soft determinists who aren't superior to people who believe in the Great Replacement Theory.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Because people believing in great replacement theory take existing issues (falling birth rates due to worker hours/absence of socialized childcare, immigration workers hiring to dodge worker rights) and arrive at weird conclusions. Propagandists are obviously unreachable as they are paid to lower wages of immigrants, but people who believe in that stuff? they see issues, they can be reached. this is all of course in personal conversations, without peer pressures, and not a duty of marginalised comrades.

Re: larger points there are two sets (well lots more than two, but two groups) of heuristics of looking at the world: the elite one and the marginal one. The elite one is squabbling about who should be in the elites and the marginal is elites shouldn't exist (communism/anarchism).

The elite one is acceptable to the masses of workers as long as they deliver on something of livable standard (like why communists collapsed in usa after ww2), and following squabbling of slowly removing barriers on entry to elites to woman/blacks/lgbtq.

But fundamentally that system of deliviring living standards is unstable due to larger arch of history of capitalists profit drive, and we now entering the zone where they have consistently not delivering for larger and larger slices of population who start asking questions. Those questions lead them to all sorts of answers , some think its cause christianity, some cause one of the groups entered the elites, some cause outsourcing to china; some think cause thats what the capitalist system does

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

And larger point about of "they arrive at weird conclusions": oligarchs create information noise of "pick your own pet theory, any theory" except communist one. If all you ever heard of communism is usa history books, would you look at what those weird communist are saying in videos with low production values and 10 k views, instead of brightly lit studios with conventionally attractive hosts?

And even here if you decide to look at it, how likely are you to drop into some sorts of sectarian infighting with finger pointing

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

"the everything is shit" hits similar wall in the owning part of society.

We live in the information age. There's no excuse for this. Mfers need to google things.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I mean if you earn 200 k a year, how likely are you to even start asking questions? why would you start asking them, isntead of thinking others are lazy bums.

And that's also ignoring following filter: is my salary (for example cocoa beans importer) built on child labor in ghana? You lose 95 % percent dice roll on first entry, another 80 percent on second one. Lots easier to internalise of "them being over there and i receive my salary over here" than to follow through

[-] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

Maybe I'm just different from most people, but my family was fairly well off and as a teenager I still was curious how everyone else was doing. How do we "stack up"? That seems like a fairly common thing.

I'm a white guy, but I still understand systemic racism is an issue 🤷 not really an excuse not to. People choose to ignore it. Poor people understand things are better for rich fucks, and they refuse to understand things are bad for poor people. The wall you face when propagandizing poor people is the facts, with rich people it's their own willful ignorance.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

i grew up poor and i didn't realize people were richer than me because i never interacted with them. i just accepted life was bad and it was for everyone.

only until i got to college i understood that i had been seriously fucked for my entire childhood and how much better your life is made just by having money.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

what if you're not curious enough to ask those kind of questions? what if you just accept that life is garbage? because that's a reasonable viewpoint to have, it's valid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The idea of personal responsibility to do and be everything right is inherently right-wing, people are products of their conditions. We are no more intelligent than normal people, we just got the info and chances to think differently

[-] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago

Agency is not the same as Free Will. Agency merely means the "choice" happens internal to a being. A child has the agency to "choose" between a healthy snack and a cookie, but their behavior will largely be dependent on what they have been (actively OR passively) trained to do.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Fair point.

I think my argument stands tho.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

You can get angry at that child all you want for not making the "choice" you want, or not putting in the effort you expect. It's not gonna do a whole lotta good without substantive action.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

You were correct I should I have free will not agency. I'm referring to adults here not children

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

If I put you, an adult, in a situation for which you lack the training, should I then get angry at you for failing?

[-] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

No, but this doesn't really map properly into the real world. People don't just receive discrete, neutral information which they either do or don't have the training to verify. The circumstances that lead to the development of ideology (bourgeois or proleratian) vary wildly and some people get radicalized into good comrades by mostly the same conditions that turn others into Klansmen. We do have a right to get a little bit angry at people who fall for propaganda.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Again, I very much recommend reading up on Classical Conditioning.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

me, a beast: waking up

my scientist: let's put that beast in a situation

me: yes honey yes-honey-left

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

IRL what doing you mean by "training" here?

I mean yeah if you asked me to operate a forklift without any instruction it's not my fault if I spear a pallet of mayo with one of the prongs.

Life isn't operating a forklift though. Being able to function in the real world comes with a lot of basic training. Depends on your material conditions a bit, but most people get taught basic reasoning, emotional regulation, morality and basic math and literacy by a combination of parents, community and school in their childhood. When they enter adulthood they're expected to expand on that base knowledge on their own, and we often judge them if they pursue garbage sources and come to garbage conclusions in doing so. Often people with near identical childhoods end up getting pulled in totally opposite directions in adulthood, two boys from the same village may end up with one joining the Bolsheviks and the other joining the Whites, I think we can hold them responsible for their choices.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

IRL what doing you mean by "training" here?

will largely be dependent on what they have been (actively OR passively) trained to do

You are being trained 24/7 by forces often completely out of your purview. Every interaction is molding your behavior behind the scenes; From things as subtle as a half smile by a total stranger to something as blatant as a billboard telling you you're not a real [insert gender here] unless you use X Product. We call it Classical Conditioning and I very much recommend reading up on it quite a bit before declaring blanket statements about human behavior.

When they enter adulthood they're expected to expand on that base knowledge on their own, and we often judge them if they pursue garbage sources and come to garbage conclusions in doing so.

All those judgements are still subjective, and the people you are judging are often judging right back. Let's be real, if you would like to get all judgmental perhaps you should be asking yourself why we're wasting time on a shitposting website while the world burns instead of doing actual work towards revolutionary action. This site is very much not an endpoint for leftism, it's a speedbump. There are like a relative handful of people on this site doing revolutionary work while the rest of us cosplay as leftists, accomplishing just as little as any other lib.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

All those judgements are still subjective, and the people you are judging are often judging right back. Let's be real, if you would like to get all judgmental perhaps you should be asking yourself why we're wasting time on a shitposting website while the world burns instead of doing actual work towards revolutionary action. This site is very much not an endpoint for leftism, it's a speedbump. There are like a relative handful of people on this site doing revolutionary work while the rest of us cosplay as leftists, accomplishing just as little as any other lib.

Well if nothing else that's a good point

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

i think there's a whole religion based on that

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago
[-] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago
[-] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

Yes, I find the same goes for ads for example and addiction to social media etc. I'm not denying both are a problem in society but I don't like the assumption that everyone is equally affected by it or when people use it as a ready-made rationalisation for something im doing.

I also think your point can also be extended to say that generally right-wingers are also way more susceptible to it, even if to some extent we all are.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

Us, we, the politically minded internet dwellers and the pmc/lanyard/neoliberal/boomer/chud/right wing psycho internet people are both hyper-aware of media. We're also hyper-aware of one another. We all tend to over-emphasize the importance of media (and therefore propaganda) in politics. That goes for traditional media like TV and new media like social media and podcasts.

Media has inserted itself as main method to know what's going on in the world for many people. That doesn't mean it's actually the only way or that it's the source of political action in the world.

Misinformation, data, propaganda, information, news, etc aren't as important to the way things are as it seems. It's not a battle between who gets to tell the story, it's the winners of the battle that get to tell the story and the winners are those who own the labor. There is demonstrable proof that illiterate, largely unread people can start and win a revolution. The question is whether that's true for the revolution to come. It'll be hard to say until it's over.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

Sorry, in my day-to-day Australian life, I repeatedly run into Soviet propaganda from 90 years ago and eventually fell for it. :(

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

I can either understand why people in my life believe that Putin is Hitler 2.0 and it's our moral imperative to kill all Russians, and work against that narrative, or I can denounce them for having common brainworms that I (and most of this site) held until a few years ago.
Or are you talking about weirdos online?

[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago
[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

If someone tried to show me propaganda, I would simply say, "No thanks."

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

People on this site literally do exactly this every day. Do you believe people in the DPRK get out and push trains?

[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

The problem with change more broadly is that in order for someone to change, they have to WANT to change. I think a lot of people don't want to change. Change is scary. Change is hard. Change can end up being worse for the individual overall, it carries some risk. Many of us live in a society that largely pushes the idea that change and growth is bad, which is honestly the most insidious propaganda of them all. Folks have to take that first giant leap first and be willing to and open to change. Or they have to be forced into change via an upsetting of their material conditions.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

it's not enough to want to change, you need to be able to as well. for one example, someone with severe adhd and no access to (effective) therapy or medication isn't going to change shit, not matter how much they want to.

kill the protestant in your head.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

i assume the majority of people who 'dont fall for the propaganda' had really easy lives. and it's funny how right wing is the viewpoint that you're better than someone for being left wing.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
140 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13198 readers
375 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS