this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
173 points (92.6% liked)

politics

19072 readers
5111 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Progressive Reps. Rashida Tlaib and Cori Bush raised signs calling on President Joe Biden to "stop sending bombs" to the Israeli military as he pledged during his State of the Union address Thursday night to provide more humanitarian aid to Gazans and decried the war's grisly death toll.

"This war has taken a greater toll on innocent civilians than all previous wars in Gaza combined. More than 30,000 Palestinians have been killed, most of whom are not Hamas," Biden said. "Thousands and thousands of innocents, women and children. Girls and boys also orphaned. Nearly two million more Palestinians under bombardment or displacement."

"A U.S. port delivering meager amounts of humanitarian aid and empty rhetoric mean nothing when they are delivered alongside U.S. bombs," said Jewish Voice for Peace Action late Thursday.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The progressive remnants of whatever the Democratic progressive caucus has become need to seriously take to the media.

For all intents and purposes, the progressive movement that started in earnest with occupy and led pretty directly to Bernie 2015-16, the squad, and Bernie 2020, is basically embers as this point. Bernie made the right decision in stepping back, but I really think he expected some of this younger generation to step forwards, and they simply haven't. Its shocking to me how some of this group have become so complacent in their 'positions' as progressives champions, that they seem to think they can do with out the movement that got them there ( looking at Fetterman and to a lessor extent AOC).

Hell I wanted Fetterman to run for president if not for that "I'm not a progressive" bullshit he pulled. Regardless, the movement is rudderless without a figurehead as almost all movements are. The infrastructure is all there, but Democrats have basically shunned progressives throughout, inspite of their uphill victories over the last 10 years. I mean Bernie had the singularly largest rise in delegates a Democratic primary had ever seen in 2015. It needs to be acknowledged that the Democratic party is a fundamentally anti-democracy institution when they won't let democracy into their primary system. I mean look at what happened to New Hampshire. There are real costs the Democratic party will exercise against you if you "vote wrong". The Democratic party has done more to frustrate the progressive movement than any other political institution, and yet progressives are still being brow-beat into caucusing with them.

I think a mid-western, led by a prominent Minnesotan or Michigander progressive could step out and form a third party with some success. They would caucuses with Democrats, but be independent and have their own primaries. It would need to form from the ashes of Our Revolution and the frankly massive volunteer base that has supported progressive and leftist candidates in this country. No I don't think DSA is sufficient. It needs to be something new and focused on Social Democracy as the underlying philosophy. The time is ripe. The generation of 14 year olds who first started paying attention in 2015 are graduating college right now and are almost assuredly thinking along the lines of Extinction Rebellion and the like. There definitely needs to be some rebranding (too much 1980s peace and justice in the Our Revolution branding). Democratizing the power base and empowering young people. A decent software stack to make organizing easy. Clever and creative approaches to fundraising and GOTV. The infrastructure is all present, and wasted on a Democratic party that doesn't really want its constituents involvement.

To circle back, what this really needs, is to blur the line between podcaster and politician. The Bush's and Tlalibs need to take a step more into the digitally native world and become regulars on the major podcasts in the progressive left circles. Its the strategy Bernie used, its the strategy Trump used, and it works for populist candidates. There is a groundswell of popularity for progressive policy that isn't going away simply because Democrats choose to ignore it (unless its campaign season of course, then we get a nice lip servicing). Bernie was especially good at using social media in a way that the other progressives simply haven't. Tlalib should get on Hasans channel and start having conversations. But it can't be that sanitized DCCC fake ass bullshit. We need to get away from the Democrats if we ever want to have success as a movement. We can and should caucus with them, but we should be seeking to maintain an independent political identity. You only have power if they have to come get your vote.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Sadly, I don't think any of them have the charisma to take up Bernie's mantle. Jon Stewart might be able to do it, but I wouldn't wish that on him.

Also, I don't think America will ever be ready for really progressive things. Yes, they say they like them, but when given the choice Americans choose not that.

For progressives to create effective strategies they need to recognize that they're insurgents, even inside the Democratic Party. Thinking that you have the people behind you if you could just convince them isn't going to happen: America is not progressive.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

I have nothing but respect for Tlaib and Bush for doing this.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

The US has to send our old stuff to someone, or it expires on the shelf. The US has to have the latest kit. -- Signed, The Military-Industrial-Complex

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Bidens a Zionist, he’s said so himself multiple times. He’ll find a way to ship them more bombs if anything.

Also that last remark is damn near similar to what I was saying on another post, mad respect for whoever that person is.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The US certainly needs to stop sending arms to Isreal. But even if they do, will the middle east please fucking stop with the religious fundamentalist leaders?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Setting aside the US's history of installing those leaders, who cares if that's what the people want?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Do you think they’re holding fair elections to elect these leaders into power?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ask America to stop installing them

The 1953 Iranian coup d'état was the U.S.- and British-instigated, Iranian army-led overthrow of the elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh in favor of strengthening the monarchical rule of the shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi

Mosaddegh had sought to audit the documents of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), a British corporation (now part of BP), to verify that AIOC was paying the contracted royalties to Iran, and to limit the company's control over Iranian oil reserves.[

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it is fucked up that they did that. Like I said, I don't support arming Israel. I don't support military intervention in the middle east at all. I don't have universal healthcare because some greedy oil baron or religious fundamentalist zealot on the other side of the Earth enslaves or massacres people because he wants a bigger share of the dumpster fire.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The religious fundies keep popping up because any time a government rightfully wants to take control of their own natural resources, a Western nation or Russia overthrows them (and now China is also starting to indebt them)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

in the old days, according to even 'the bible', if your people had resources, but just bronze weapons, your gonna get some iron-wielding visitors soon. Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss.