this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
186 points (97.9% liked)

News

23266 readers
3657 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

When it comes to safety culture at Boeing, there is a “disconnect” between senior management and workers, and employees responsible for checking the company’s planes question whether they can raise issues without fear of retaliation, according to a panel of outside experts.

The aviation-industry and government experts also said safety training and procedures at Boeing are constantly changing, leading to confusion among employees.

The comments were contained in a report Monday to the Federal Aviation Administration. Congress ordered the study in 2020, when it passed legislation to reform how the FAA certifies new planes after two deadly crashes involving Boeing 737 Max jetliners.

Safety at Boeing is being re-examined after last month’s blowout of an emergency door panel on an Alaska Airlines Max jet. Accident investigators said in a preliminary report that bolts used to help hold the panel in place were missing after the plane underwent repairs at Boeing’s factory in Renton, Washington.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 8 months ago (3 children)

...has made changes that have reduced the chance of retaliation against employees who report safety problems...

There should be ZERO chances of retaliation. Reporting safety problem should be rewarded. and not just safety problems, any non-conformity must be properly documented and acted on.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago

This isn't even just a job standpoint. Retaliation in general can be illegal (well...depending. I know that gets messy) but in an industry like this? holy fuck that should not just be a lawsuit or some shit. That should be straight up fucking jailtime.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

This is a huge thing at hospitals. You need a just culture where employees have the psychological safety to report issues otherwise people die.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean yeah but when you have 50,000 employees there's like 20,000 of them in a management position.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Roles and responsibilities. People who's role is to report non conformities should not be managed by people who 's role is to deliver on time. That's a conflict of interest. That goes all the way up the chain of command. Manufacturing and quality are meant to be independant.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Yes absolutely. That should winnow down the number of people responsible for the culture a bit.

But you also have people reporting to Operations (not quality) who will discover defects. And then they either need to feel empowered to inform quality or their manager.

Independent quality function does not completely solve the culture problem. In fsct, I'd bet their quality organization is independent.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My friend is an engineer at Boeing and she has had a hell of a time lately due to all the extra work coming through. She’s still being pushed to move forward even if the planes aren’t ready, and the executive team is blaming the engineers. It’s fucking wild.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

My wife has been with Boeing for about 16 years. She works in finance though. Still, I hear from her constantly about how ass backwards everything they do is. I'm convinced the company is going to be broken up and sold off in pieces one of these days.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Entire management team needs to be removed and revamped. Still will take a long time to regain trust.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As a society I feel we are over managed and over administered. Colleges, hospitals, and companies have dozens of highly paid executives and administrators who add little value and do even less work.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The primary problem is that centralized decision making is necessary, but the type of people who seek out those positions tend to be power hungry and make changes to establish their authority instead of making decisions based on what is actually best for the organization.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I don’t think decision making needs to be nearly as centralized as it is. David Graeber wrote - I think in Bullshit Jobs but maybe something else - about a nursing company in the Netherlands where it’s broken into democratic work groups. They have low overhead and high patient and worker satisfaction.

By putting the decision making closer to the work I think you get better decisions.

Edit: I looked it up and it was Rutger Bregman in "Humankind"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

“The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them. To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.” Douglas Adams

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Quality and safety will always be at odds with the bottom line.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

This is the real disconnect. As long as executives' pay are related to profits or stock prices, they will never make safety the #1 priority.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In Boeing's case that's probably the reality of the last couple decades. The beancounters have gotten in the way of Safety.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Brought to you by McDonnell Douglas.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I flew in an exit row on a 737 last week. I kinda want to get a shirt made commemorating my survival.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Make it look like a roller coaster and have it say “I survived THE MAX”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The neat part is that if Airbus starts having safety problems there’s exactly zero other competition.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Embraer? For the smaller types of airliners at least

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Owned by Boeing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

COMAC, but there would be no way a new manufacturer would be able to keep up with global demand.

https://skift.com/2024/02/25/can-chinas-new-plane-compete-with-airbus-and-boeing/

Airbus doesn't have the safety issues Boeing has. Airbus put in the proper R&D including safety into the A320neo to make it a safe plane. Boeing needed to play catch up to make something that could compete against Airbus's plane and decided to cut corners.