Photoshop Nonsense

406 readers

1 users here now

Post dumb bs image edits

Rules

founded 8 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

[Meta] Community Rules (suppo.fi)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What to post:

Yes:

Weird surreal image edit art
Visual jokes
Images that have been photoshopped to depict or mean something else than the original.
Sbubby (logos or other text images edited)

No:

Memes
Politically motivated posts
NSFW
AI generated images or automatic filters:
- Using generated images in source material is OK, but the "photoshop" part must be real human labour.
Posts where the subject's identity is the sole point.
- Negative posts will receive a stricter interpretation. We want to avoid hate trains, even if the subject is a real POS.

Comments are open for further discussion and suggestions.

top 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Where are you? This community is dope ! I'm FUCKING EXCITED ABOUT IT !!! LOL

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Great to see someone excited, and thank you for posting your nonsense. Guess I really should spend some effort to keep this alive now that I started it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Omg yes please 🙏 I love love LOVE this community and communities like it. It's fucking so awesome dude. One of the best in my opinion! Keep it up!

Did you make any other communities by chance?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What if we avoid politics? This year is already getting out of hand in the USA with the lead up to the presidential election in November. Photoshop has an ability to start big, ugly arguments quickly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I actually just thought about politics and bad faith posts. Again, gotta come up with a clear definition, but I want to at least avoid posts that are clearly politically motivated.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Rule suggestion: Top-level comments on image prompt posts must contain an edited version of the image. Further discussion is allowed as replies to the top-level comments.

Thoughts?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Separating discussion isn't a bad idea. Could also reserve one top-level comment for a collapsible discussion thread.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

You might want to take an official position on dank.

Some find that corruption/rot/evil is too-much, others want it to overwhelm the world, because it is "their thing".

Pick a side.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sbubby-ish posts: yea or nay?

Halo Kitty
Barbie Doom Horse Adventures
Wookies

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think yes, unless a proper specific community surfaces on lemmy later.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

No posts targeted at a person is probably a good rule.

Not OK:

Posts where the subject's identity is the sole point.

OK:

Posts where the subject's identity plays a part, but the focus is on something else. For example, the subject could be doing something interesting, wearing a strange outfit.