this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
34 points (90.5% liked)

Formula 1

9077 readers
40 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 21-23 Nov
πŸ‡ΆπŸ‡¦ Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

If I was in the merc aero team and red bull made it work, it would resign out of shame

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Wasn't Mercedes consistently saying their performance issues weren't due to the sidepods? The primary issue was the floor and having to run a higher ride height.

Assuming that was true, then it makes sense RB would want to go after the benefits of the zero pods if they can maintain floor and suspension performance.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

It's not zeropods.

If it still has sizable pods on the side... then it's sidepods. Slightly shrinking the air intakes and making them vertical is not the same as Merc's zeropod design.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Read the article, it claims that it will be from the race in Japan

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The article is wrong. It's not zeropods. They're just pedalling clickbait.

Smaller, vertical air intakes != Zeropods.

They just know you're more likely to click/share if they call it zeropods.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Hard to blame them for not reading an article that forces a user to disable their adblocker. Fuck that...