0
@[email protected] @fedidevs @fediversenews To the people on this thread who talk about GDPR violations: I’d be interested in the specific clause in the GDPR that you (social.coop)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

@[email protected] @activitypubblueskybridge @fedidevs @fediversenews To the people on this thread who talk about GDPR violations: I’d be interested in the specific clause in the GDPR that you believe a bridge like this violates. Curious.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]

Johannes, There isn't one - they're talking out of their ass.

They're just making noise and emotionally distressed to discover that this is how the #Fediverse currently works, and always has worked - and it's not just the #ActivityPub portions of the Fediverse, or even the Fediverse - it's the entire #Internet...

"If you affect a public post, you have no expectation of privacy".

For those who still feel some sense of having been offended, I welcome them to unplug their computers and toss their iPhones and Androids into the trash. That's really their only option, and they'll come to that realization some day, maybe, and it is of no consequence for anyone else in the world if they don't.

#tallship #FOSS #networking #privacy #ignorance

⛵️

.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@[email protected] The counterpoint is that people generally respect CC licenses (weakly) attached to their creations. (For people != the AI crowd)

We need something similar to that — well, inspired by — for posts. I’m sure Ryan would gladly honor “do not propagate to for-profit entities”, for example, if it could be attached to a post.

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]

Yes, we do try to respect the Creative Commons licenses - it's a great thing.

And statistically, studies have revealed that we also do our very best to respect the wishes of publishers who rebuke and refuse to allow their works in a distribution channel where items are DRM encoded.

People should have more faith in the intentions of folks trying to do good, methinks :)

There will always be bad actors

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] a believer in the goodness of people! I thought that species went extinct! Is there a club I can join?

this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

AP-AT-Bridge Group

0 readers
1 users here now

A public group for discussion of developing software bridge between ActivityPub and AT Protocol used by BlueSky.

Joining and contributing to a Friendica group is easy. To share your posts, follow these steps:

  1. Follow this group.
  2. To post to the group, post on Mastodon as normal and @mention this group.
  3. The group will then boost your post.

You don't need to be a Friendica user to join this group. Because Friendica is part of the fediverse, this group is available to everyone -- including people who use Mastodon!

founded 7 months ago