this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
190 points (94.8% liked)

science

14714 readers
459 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

a result that is set to fuel optimism

I see what they did there.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Hopefully it fuels more than that soon.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

This kind of news is the reason I'm still optimistic

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok only another 50 years to go :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's always been 50 years of good funding away. So that's just going to keep moving.

The reason science always advances so much during big wars is the military is desperate to get any advantage it can so science gets a larger chunk of their budget.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

This is actually quite promising. It seems the progress is accelerating. ITER is not that far away anymore either, with first plasma in 2025

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

always hear Dan Aykroyd saying, "I've worked in the private sector. They expect results."

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

sure they did

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Researchers at weapons facility achieve 2MJ of heat for a cost of tens of MJ of electricity and chemical energy to power single-shot laser fired at target that took at least gigajoules to produce for method that will never have any relevance to energy generation.

But they pinky swear that at some point they might think about electricity so keep giving them a big chunk of the civialian energy budget.