this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
102 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1480 readers
370 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

(via mastodon)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TinyTimmyTokyo@awful.systems 31 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Eats the same bland meal every day of his life. Takes an ungodly number of pills every morning. Uses his son as his own personal blood boy. Has given himself a physical appearance that can only be described as "uncanny valley".

I'll never understand the extremes some of these tech bros will go to deny the inevitability of death.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Deebster@programming.dev 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I guess this counts as long Covid, although I associate it more with brain fog and similar symptoms.

Either way, "lung capacity of an 18-year-old" and "15% loss of lung capacity" can't both be true, unless he's suggesting he started with super-lungs.

[–] jonhendry@awful.systems 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Or he now has the lung capacity of a 15% smaller 18 year old.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

a large lung the size of a small lung

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 7 points 10 months ago

"A lung small in the same way a large one isn't" ~ T. Pratchett

[–] saucerwizard@awful.systems 10 points 10 months ago (14 children)

Has any of the life extension space produced anything like, real?

[–] self@awful.systems 25 points 10 months ago

the supposed life extending properties of a glass of red wine every day are an excellent way to turn a wine mom into a full blown alcoholic

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

My information is about a decade out of date, for reasons which I will explain later because it is an interesting and semi related story. But I recall from the days that humanity+ magazine still posted blog articles that there were about seven processes in the human body that causes aging (don't ask me which seven or how to evaluate the research so take this all with a bit of salt). And I'd assume that all seven of them are important and need to be dealt with at the same time. Also there was interesting and effective life extension research done on mice with both low kcal (but that didn't research life quality) and blood transfusions, but I have no idea if this ever scales up to humans. A long time ago SSC did find a 'all those nootropics you take, how effective are they really according to the science?' site and iirc the only thing that really was effective (for being more productive/smart as that is the focus of LW) was caffeine, and some minor others but 90% of them didn't work (sadly I don't hve a link, but iirc this was based on actual science and not the normal SSC selfreports (which it did slightly match iirc but the self reports had a lot of 'I touched grass', 'I worked out', 'I took the meds my doc said I should take', and 'I slept a normal amount' things which also were effective nothing really groundbreaking seems there isn't an easy hack (which should loop back into the anti-aging thing which I assume there also isn't an easy hack, so Quikin is right, eat those veggies).

CW: one reference to transphobia, and a long rambling post about the blog part of the humanity+ magazine, and some public people related to that.So there that is what I can recall and have glanced about the anti-aging stuff, now for the H+ magazine gossip (CW: reference of transphobia, of course). H+mag used to be a blog/magazine which regularly posted articles about all kinds of transhumanist subjects, from robotics to anti-aging to a bit 'woo' articles about greater humanity (don't get me wrong those articles were fine, I thought the 'woo' articles (and that is my phrasing, it wasn't as bad as I make it out to be, but it was a bit woo for a transhumanist magazine) were interesting and it fitted with the idea of H+ to be a humanist transhumanist organization. After all, we should all benefit from technological advances, and people should not be left behind. And then suddenly the constant trickle of H+ articles in my rss reader stopped. That confused me, esp as the last article (in my rss reader) was a imho pretty normal post from the (iirc) main guy behind the magazine/blog who said that we should make sure that everybody benefits from transhumanism and that we should be careful with rightwing people in the movement who don't want that. This article no longer exists (well the whole blog no longer exists, and the url is dead), it was deleted so quickly that the normal cache things like google or the wayback machine didn't index it, and the only reason I had seen it was because my rss reader had kept a local copy. After this the blog/mag basically was dead, there were a couple more articles posted but the amount went from several a week to one a month. I have no idea who pulled the plug, but it is pretty worrying, as apparently some of the C-suite of H+ are not that onboard with everybody sharing in the transhumanist future. (That Natasha Vita-More (ex-director) wrote an transphobic 'you cannot change gender/sex' thing somewhere 2018 (how can you be into transhumanism and think this? How can you want to live forever in such a way that you refuse to give your age, but be so weird about trans people. I'm not mad, I'm disappointed) is worrying. Ben Goertzel, who used to be big into robotics and AI latest book (in 2018 according to wikipedia) was about PSI (I'm sure he will be back to AI soon now that that is popular). So this is all pretty weird. Vita-More also follows a few d/acc accounts (which is one of those techno optimist offshoots from concurrency people) and various libertarian causes things. So what I think is what happened with h+ mag is that the right libertarians and the left humanist/socialist/etc in the transhumanist movement got into an early clash re the upcoming culture wars (iirc this was before the start of the online culture wars of 2014) and this split large parts of the movement apart and caused a more inward focus vs the broader popularization and optimism of the early 2010s. This idea is also slightly matched by the history timeline of transhumanism kept by the H+ people. (also note im not saying the H+ people are far right (while doing a quick skim I even saw Vita-More had spoken against the far right (on the subject of AI but still, being against the far right good (that she did it by platforming a steve bannon goon is bad however)), I'd think most of them are just californian ideologians/libertarians who don't want to be really bothered by the culture wars because they just want to live forever). But it is interesting how weird it all got, and how the hypewave of the 2010s seems to have died down re-anti aging. (Of course what is more likely is just that my sources into reading this all disappeared and I see that as the hype wave drying up, anyway talked about the H+mag blog stuff on reddit before but don't think I have ever talked about it here, so here is my long rambling post (I also did a lookup on what some of the visible people, most of it was silent after 2018, but it seems various things (like the H+mag facebook page (yes very retro)) are starting up again this year guess the hype is back!).


[–] saucerwizard@awful.systems 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Wasn’t Racheal Haywire involved with that?

[–] earthquake@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Rachel Haywire

Now that's a rabbit-hole. As far as I can tell, she ran (runs?) a facebook group called "Humanity 2.0". She "leaves neoreaction" every few years and is back within months. In 2019 she violated the by-laws of the Transhumanist Party elections by mentioning "Jeffrey Epstein or the history of Humanity+". What they mean is that mentioning that Epstein donated $100,000 to Humanity+ in 2011 "hurts the public image of transhumanism".

She apparently ran for Humanity+ President in 2013, lost(?), trash-talked Natasha Vita-More, who withdrew H+ support from Haywire since? It's not clear, a lot of links are dead/scrubbed since then.

http://transhumanist-party.org/tag/rachel-haywire/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/transhumanistparty/posts/2389157701305002/
https://hpluspedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Haywire
https://snoo.habedieeh.re/r/Transhuman/comments/139x2s/natasha_vitamore_vs_rachel_haywire/ (alternative reddit frontend)

Bonus: Ye Gods, her interview with an Urbit developer is really, truly, amazingly awful: https://archive.is/5I7Td

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

It’s not clear, a lot of links are dead/scrubbed since then.

That happens a lot with this H+ related stuff there also just seem to be periods where there is no content to mix it all up. (which, if you are going to be a bit delete happy is a good way to hide your deletions in the void, but in our advertisement seo driven world this is not a good method if you want to become well known and get your ideas out there, but I'm digressing and I don't know the real goals of anybody here).

But yeah, looked into Haywire and got a bad vibe from her (and an annoying vibe, I don't know how to put it into words yet, but I have noticed it in places, a sort of manic tech positivist (which can still be negative about the tech in a criti-hype way) writing of boundless opportunities and everything going faster and quicker and better just across the horizon, Don't get left behind! But it remains all words and there is the vague stench of far right/libertarian bs, and no actual real tech. Manic Pixie I Fucking Love Science posting (this is not great as it misses the spiritual element of this style of posting, but I have not found the correct words to describe it, in the case of Haywire that she is an industrial goth musician fits).

Vaguely related but calling the discussion between Haywire and Vita-More a catfight (in the link to some (now dead) Kurzweil forum) is a bit of that unconscious sexism which happens a bit in tech spaces (I'm just assuming it wasn't intentional).

Also I might have physically let out a groan due to the 'trigger warning' magazine name. (I also have some of her music apparently (A few of the Endzeit Bunkertracks collections) and oof she was singing about 'being banned from everything you created' in 2012 already. So very ahead on the curve on that one. (The music itself isn't bad for that kind of industrial cybergoth stuff, just a bit mid (And I don't mean that in an insulting way, bad cybergoth stuff is really bad imho)).

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gerikson@awful.systems 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ye Gods, her interview with an Urbit developer is really, truly, amazingly awful: https://archive.is/5I7Td

It always surprises me to discover that there are actual true believers who are worried how to build Urbit on web3, and who fret that Urbit is not compatible with AI. This in the same piece that states that Urbit might be finished/usable in 100 years. Do they really believe that web3 and AI are gonna be around then?

Also LOL that LLM can't grok Hoon. It's a backhanded compliment, but a compliment nonetheless.

[–] earthquake@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Urbit might be finished/usable in 100 years

In the comments someone asks the dev Jurij "What is the killer application or feature that I must have?" and he replies "No one knows."

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The killer app is to filter out the fascists and gather them in one convenient place.

See also Yarvin's idea about people opting out of "the Cathedral" and suddenly taking power.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dgerard@awful.systems 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

none of Aubrey de Grey's longevity stuff really worked out, and then he got kicked out of the org he founded for sexual harassment

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 5 points 10 months ago

Not a big shock.

[–] acausal_masochist@awful.systems 6 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Has anyone else told you that the nested parentheses make your writing hard to read? Not a sarcastic or rhetorical question, I genuinely don't know if I'm the only one who has a hard time with them, especially when you don't close them lol

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] quinkin@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Eating green leafy vegetables correlates with longer lifespan.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] sramder@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Now just take the blood you’ve stored in your covid free child b a c k, and give him his old sick blood back…

load more comments
view more: next ›