For anyone wondering what "Rammy" is and why it's on this list:
Screenshots
(Okay, I included the last post cause I thought it was funny, but it goes to show the type of people on there. If this isn't convincing, then go take a look at the instance yourself. Not linking it here but it's very easy to find.)
Go figure the posts all seem to be made by Exploding Heads. That said I hadn't heard of the community until now so thanks for the info.
Why are they branching off instead of staying on one instance for one big community to talk amongst each other? Make some wonder if the intention is more to gain an audience and then make another instance if defederated and then another to spread their message instead of enjoying each other's company.
That would be like asking "why r/thedonald filled reddit with hate and misinformation instead of staying inside their sub?", it's because that's their aim, to be read by everyone and spread their cult, to yell harder than everyone else calling them out to silence them.
Think of them as an infection or a parasite.
I'm certainly not advocating for lemmygrad, and not even a user at FMHY, but somewhat surprised to see them on the list.
I mean they're relentless with propaganda and misinformation, and I've blocked them in my client, just wondering where they fit into rule 1.
Maybe drama I suppose.
If you were looking for feedback, I would replace "overwhelming amount" in rule one with "significant and unregulated".
I'd also replace "mostly" in rule 2 with the same.
It's always going to be subjective and discretionary, but I feel like the wording as it is allows for more scope for users of banned instances to feel targeted (and therefore persecuted), than is absolutely necessary.
I might also include a sentence like "the primary objective of this policy is to promote the best possible experience for users of FMHY, and therefore requires admins to exercise discretion to determine which instances consistently undermine that objective for the majority of our users."
... the implication being that someone personally may feel wronged by a particular decision to defederate whatever instance, but you're trying to get the best outcome for the most users.
Regardless, it's always good to publish a policy and promote some transparency. Good job.
I thought being a pirate meant not picking sides