this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
30 points (100.0% liked)

em_poc

1368 readers
2 users here now

Official Title of this Community: Ethnic Minorities and People of Color

Why is the title different?

We like to have fun here.

What is this place? A safe space for underrepresented peoples and peoples of color to talk, chill, and vibe.

What are the basic rules of the community?

  1. Follow Lemmy TOS and Community Guidelines. Non negotiable. This is the bedrock and mods will make decisions with this always in mind.

  2. This community is for ethnic minorities and people of color. This is a safe space where such people can freely discuss their struggles, insight, and thoughts without fear. If you are not, we respectfully ask you do not post or comment here. A future community will be established to allow for racial discussions with a mixed userbase. However, remember, comments here must still respect Lemmy TOS and Community Guidelines.

  3. Irony Racism is still racism. Racism is bad m'kay? We will treat irony racism and bad faith racist satire as racism. Will wield the ban hammer accordingly.

  4. No sectarianism: This is an identity channel not a channel for you all to complain about why XYZ isn't the "one true leftism". Take that to another place.

  5. Stupidpol is not allowed. Stupidpol is class reductionist. We are an identity community. Thinking like stupidpol ignores the struggles of the oppressed, their voices, and their need for unique support. Nothing says oppression more than someone saying that the identity you have is "not real" and that if you only thought like them you'd see what your "real" identity is. Mods reserve the right to ban users and content who promote stupidpol, stupidpol memes, and other class reductionist thinking.

FAQ

I don't look XYZ and/or sometimes I can pass as white so I don't know if I can post here. Can I?

What can I post?

Suggested Posts

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He’s definitely had a negative impact on Indian people and anyone who’s brown lol. Growing up whenever kids encountered an Indian student, they’d tried to do Apu’s accent and catchphrase or ask them to do. It was definitely insulting, and in addition to the voice The Simpson also played into the “500 children Indian family” stereotype.

But outside of that, growing up I never associated Apu’s greed and workaholicism with Indians, and I don’t know if there’s a stereotype of Indians being cheap and greedy.

But funnily enough, I’ve always associated his greed with business owners in general even when I was a kid. As an immigrant myself, I also saw his workaholic personality “relatable.” Seeing my parents work all the time, then learning it was literally 24 hours a day as soon as they arrived in the states, made me see Apu as a tragic figure. Of course it’s often played up for laughs (him being shot and robbed many times and only worrying about work, him only thinking about work above all else), but I saw that in my parents as well. Even when they were struggling to get out of bed due to sickness or walk because they got a foot injury, they had to soldier on because they were deathly afraid of getting fired and not being able to feed us. I didn’t see Apu as a role model or anything; I just saw him as a composite of my parents and many immigrants taken to the extreme.

All in all, I wouldn’t want him back in his former form because it affects Indians (and anyone with dark skin because Americans are idiots) negatively while the other stereotypical characters don’t really affect culture (e.g. Willy, Krusty). But rewatching the simpsons, I just thought it’s interesting that my experience with him was probably more than what the creators intended. Given the current state of the show, I don’t think they can bring him back in any meaningful way while keeping him funny. It’s best he’s retired, and I hope it’s the first step for the whole show to get retired.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

apu would've been fine if other crackers could behave themselves.

i always thought the convenience store owner part (and then the arranged marriage and so on) was the stereotype part, with most of the nonsense he did being his shit rather than being a statement about indians as a whole. of course minorities don't get to just be individuals.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

Yeah most, if not all, the defenses for him came from shire people and it basically boiled down to “who cares? it’s funny”

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

My only frame of reference is some edgy newgroundser's 45 minute screed telling indian people to get over it because he got called Mario in grade school anti-italian-action

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I remember that when The Problem with Apu came out some quazi-anti-SJW YouTuber defended him by saying no one was offended by Chief Wiggum making cops look bad. He hadn't considered the fact that cops are tools of the ruling class and that Wiggum didn't make them look bad enough.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

I miss the first ten seasons of The Simpsons infinitely more than I miss Apu

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Like many early representations of minorities, it's deeply flawed, but like you said it showed Apu as a mostly normal person for a group that was largely invisible before then.

So...he was necessary but we have moved past the need for him.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Hell, Indian culture still feels pretty much invisible today. I can't even remember the last time I saw an Indian character featured in any show, book, or movie I've seen recently. Maybe that's on me, but also it just doesn't feel like Indian characters are common at all in Western media, relative to their enormous presence in the world or even as compared to other ethnicities. Always seemed weird to me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

I miss Apu.