this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
41 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4065 readers
593 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Lmao "planning to", as if they already aren't.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

The US used to have nuclear weapons stationed at Lakenheath, but (officially) they were withdrawn in 2008. They still have them elsewhere in Europe.

I think it was announced that nuclear weapons capabilities(but not the weapons themselves) would be re-established there last year.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The US is planning to station nuclear weapons in the UK for the first time in 15 years amid a growing threat from Russia, according to a report.

A Ministry of Defence spokesperson said: “It remains a longstanding UK and Nato policy to neither confirm nor deny the presence of nuclear weapons at a given location.”

Calls have recently come from senior figures on both sides of the Atlantic for the UK to be prepared in case of a potential war between Nato forces and Russia.

Earlier this week, Gen Sir Patrick Sanders, the outgoing head of the British army, said its 74,000-strong ranks need to be bolstered by at least 45,000 reservists and citizens in order to be better readied for possible conflict.

Carlos Del Toro, the US navy secretary, has urged the UK to “reassess” the size of its armed forces given “the threats that exist today”.

Downing Street defended the UK government’s spending on defence, saying Britain had been Washington’s “partner of choice” in its strikes against Houthi rebels in the Red Sea because of its “military strength”.


The original article contains 258 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 30%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!