this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
51 points (93.2% liked)

OpenStreetMap community

4165 readers
14 users here now

Everything #OpenStreetMap related is welcome: software releases, showing of your work, questions about how to tag something, as long as it has to do with OpenStreetMap or OpenStreetMap-related software.

OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.

Join OpenStreetMap and start mapping: https://www.openstreetmap.org.

There are many communication channels about OSM, many organized around a certain country or region. Discover them on https://openstreetmap.community

https://mapcomplete.org is an easy-to-use website to view, edit and add points (such as shops, restaurants and others)

https://learnosm.org/en/ has a lot of information for beginners too.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
51
A nearby city call these crossings as "Gora¹ Lanes", an attempt to make walking fun, attractive, and accessible to more people. (cdn.masto.host)
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A nearby city call these crossings as "Gora¹ Lanes", an attempt to make walking fun, attractive, and accessible to more people.

From the screenshot² below, it's something like an arty zebra (or "continental") crossing, and I saw minimal use of crossing:markings=artwork in #OpenStreetMap, and taggable with crossing:markings=yes.

I wonder how you folks might tag it.

¹ - Gora is an acronym from "Green Open Reclaimed Access"
² - Source: screenshot, https://yewtu.be/lKMFjLcTVkQ?t=59

@openstreetmap

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm perfectly fine with the crosswalk being painted in a more interesting way, but looking at the sidewalk on the other side of the street there makes me think maybe that city has some more important things they need to work on for walkability before they should start worrying about prettifying stuff.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

@zephr_c

Well, unfortunately, what we see on the ground (and try to map in #OpenStreetMap ) is not necessarily always what we (or the locals) wanted, or hope to ever see.

Hopefully, it's a work in progress, and they get around to fixing more essential things. 🤞

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago

I'm not sure sacrificing clarity for quirkiness is progress.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What is green, or open or reclaimed about this? Let alone all of these?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm more wondering what the fuck is "nearby" about it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

I think with that OP referenced a city close to where they live

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's like a captcha for self driving cars. Should I use extra caution or not? Can I go or do I let the skinfolk pass first?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

It's always best to use extra caution with self driving cars.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

Stuff like this bothers me. If cars, pedestrians, or cyclists use the crossing and the road that it crosses over, painted lines and way finding markers need to be consistent and clear for safety.

It's fine to paint a crossing like this at an entryway to a museum or library, but not on a road.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

Dazzle camo for pedestrians

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah, can you imagine the shit storm if someone rigged up traffic lights with some strobe effect and RGB LEDs to make driving, "fun, attractive, and accessible to more people."

In my cynicism I'll venture that if pedestrians were required to carry insurance for collisions, insurance companies would not let these cross walks stick around for a hot 5 minutes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

@MapAmore @openstreetmap crossing:markings=artwork seems a good key. crossing:markings=yes is too generic, IMHO

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

@mannivu

I agree. It's typical in OSM to use a generic "yes" when a mapper isn't sure about the "right" value just yet, and get back to it later, or maybe the next mapper can figure out a better value.

That's a specific case when I find the image=*, or mapillary=* tags and the like, very helpful. Usually, these are used to tell other mappers what the previous mapper saw from the photo.

In JOSM these are turned into links you can view, but not sure how it works in iD.

@openstreetmap

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

@MapAmore @openstreetmap just checked, and if you add an image= tag you get a clickable link in iD too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

@SeeandMap @MapAmore @openstreetmap I know, I know, it was just a test. I knew where to find a POI with a linked Commons File and pasted the URL in the image tag, but I didn't save it 😉

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

@[email protected]

But wait, there's more #StreetArt crossings! :mastorofl:

https://designbump.com/28-unbelievable-pedestrian-crossing-street-art/

@[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

What the cinnamon toast fuck is this? I'd tag it as a public art installation and tag the crossing separately as unmarked.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

@openstreetmap

I just learned that apart from the official meaning of "Gora" cited in the original toot, apparently, it appears to be a nod towards the argot of the @pinoy #LGBQT community, meaning "Let's go."

:lgbtqosm: