this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
1011 points (98.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

19551 readers
1273 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 112 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

And the worst part is when it actually does and you have no fucking idea what went wrong before.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The pc had the hiccups and now it's fine. Problem solved!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Some times my game engine needs a wake up run, then an actual run.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 104 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That's step zero: rule out black magic

[–] [email protected] 59 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Those damn cosmic rays flipping my bits

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

Please tell me you look skyward, shake your fist and yell damn you!!!!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if there's an available OS that parity checks every operation, analogous to what's planned for Quantum computers.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Unrelated, but the other day I read that the main computer for core calculation in Fukushima's nuclear plant used to run a very old CPU with 4 cores. All calculations are done in each core, and the result must be exactly the same. If one of them was different, they knew there was a bit flip, and can discard that one calculation for that one core.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago

That feeling when it is, in fact, computer ghosts.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Me: "Hmm... No... No the code is good, it's the compiler that's wrong."

runs again

[–] [email protected] 61 points 9 months ago (10 children)

Yeah, but sometimes it works.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's even worse then: that means it's probably a race condition and do you really want to run the risk of having it randomly fail in Production or during an important presentation? Also race conditions generally are way harder to figure out and fix that the more "reliable" kind of bug.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

Good luck figuring out why it sometimes doesn't work 🙃

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

Mmm, race conditions, just like mama used to make.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

There was that kind of bug in Linux and a person restarted it idk how much (iirc around 2k times) just to debug it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

This is 100% valid when dealing with code generation sometimes and I hate it

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 9 months ago

The first is a surprise; the second is testing.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hmm..you may be right. I'll get my Hispanic friend to run it and see if he gets the same result.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

ok, then we ship your machine.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

i sometimes do that so i can inspect the error messages on a cleared terminal

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

Sometimes I forget what I was looking for and have to restart the mental loop when doing this.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

One of my old programs produces a broken build unless you then compile it again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just had that happen to me today. Setup logging statements and reran the job, and it ran successfully.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've had that happen, the logging statements stopped a race condition. After I removed them it came back...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Thank you for playing Wing Commander!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)
======== 37/37 tests passing ========
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

That's when the real debug session begins

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Great time to find out your tests are useless!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

The crazy thing is that sometimes this just works...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

If that doesn't work, sometimes your computer just needs a rest. Take the rest of the day off and try it again tomorrow.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I often do this, but I always hit Ctrl-S before running it again. Shamefully, this probably works about 10% of the time. Does that technically count as changing nothing?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

That and a make clean can work wonders.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well, duh! You need to use the right incantations!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I actually did this earlier today

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

it's only dumb til it works

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Got to make sure it's not one of those phantom failures.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Sponsored by QA gang. Gotta make sure it's a 5/5 issue and not just a frequent issue

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

"Works in my environment."

load more comments
view more: next ›