this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
171 points (98.9% liked)

Astronomy

4122 readers
34 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It legit looks like an AI image generator was told to generate a nebula that's also a bat

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I feel like this has definitely been touched up.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

NASA always touches up their photographs to add color and contrast or else space would look very boring.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I highly doubt NASA is in the business of doing that (and FWIW Snopes agrees with me).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

There's a big difference between "touched up" as in, fix the contrast and adjust the color balance, versus "touched up" as in let's make a nebula look like a bat. The first, me and Ricky are in agreement that they're doing. The second, me and Snopes feel strongly that they're not doing.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Whoa. It looks like a bat. Not like the horse head nebula, which looks more like a headless human to me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@fossilesque Geez... Scarecrow, this stuff is fucked up! Ya sure about this dosage?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago