Rust

6004 readers

3 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

[email protected]

Credits

The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Coroutines / Generators - Resume with a value after a Yield? (lemmy.world)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Please let me know if this is possible...

I would like to be able to have a coroutine / generator yield to resume with a value.

This is a simplified version of what I am looking for:

https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=8be2f397f600236b66970fce5c0ecab6

In this example, yield would end up requesting from the parent, that it wants to read the next byte, and the parent would resume the coroutine with the next byte. (In this case, it's hardcoded to 54, but it can be any value.)

Yet it seems like Rust doesn't have the ability to resume a yield with a value.

Is there any way I can get this to work?

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think your playground link might be broken because of all the amp bits.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You are right. I fixed it just now. That is an annoying "feature" of lemmy...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Converting ampersands to say amp instead is a bug that got fixed in version 0.19, world hasnt upgraded yet though

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Amp is a Google thing, not a Lemmy thing. I can't see the original, so I can't tell if it's a Lemmy thing or some client that has issues.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're talking about &, the HTML code for an ampersand.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Ah, thanks. :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Is there any way I can get this to work?

Probably not, but it has been suggested. I'm a little surprised that yield is an expression here, because the RFC seems to only allow it as a statement.

The only way I can think of doing it is to use something like a channel (send the receive end to the coroutine) and read right after yielding. Nothing in the API suggests that they've taken that into account yet.

Maybe it's going to be addressed in a follow-up RFC? Like maybe there will be an optional resume_with_value() or something?