this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7195 readers
683 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Blatant politics from the Supreme Court. The states had no standing to appear before the court on a federal issue. Kagan dissent was the ruling that should have been.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

What a fucking joke.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I do not get how these 6 states were determined to have standing in the first place? Isn't the whole US justice system predicated on the fact that you need to experience direct or indirect harm, be an actually involved party for you to be able to sue? They're federal loans, so federal money, where does their standing come from?