The problem was acknowledged in a frank and unqualified manner... and they want to try fixing it? Is that allowed? Things can get better?? I, uh... gotta go return some videotapes
this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
99 points (95.4% liked)
United Kingdom
4065 readers
634 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The same thing was said in 1999 at the publication of the Macpherson report in the aftermath of the death of Stephen Lawrence. So why has nothing changed in the past 25 years?
That was a report on The Met. This is the chair of the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) on, presumably England's police as a whole.
Just run yourself a query "FoI uk police with criminal convictions". FoI stands for "freedom of information".
You won't be surprised to learn, from clicking a few of the results, that high ranking officers are convicted of serious crimes but are still great police officers.
Then, try the same query again with rape and sexual assault.
The site is poorly optimized for mobile, can you summarise?
I found if you turn it sideways it becomes legible.
Thank you kind netizen!
Anyone noting the sexual convictions for serving officers - not accusations, convictions.
/u/squizzy
It's just a recent example instance of one of the search results.
You're better off trying the same search and picking a few links to follow.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Stephens – elected by his fellow chief constables to lead their representative body – emphasised it was his personal view that discrimination in policing operated at an “institutional level”.
Stephens’ remarks come as policing continues to wrestle with the issue of whether it should accept it suffers from institutional discrimination, a debate dating back more than 30 years.
His intervention will add to pressure on the heads of England’s biggest forces to adopt the idea – including the Metropolitan police commissioner, Sir Mark Rowley.
Asked for clarity on whether his personal view was that “police are institutionally racist”, Stephens replied “yes”, while emphasising that his reasoning for reaching that conclusion was important.
After the murder of George Floyd in the US and the subsequent Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, the NPCC promised reform and launched a race action plan – which critics say has done little or nothing after three years.
The scale of the racial disparity in the use of force in England and Wales was laid out by police leaders in 2022, when they launched the first written version of their race plan.
The original article contains 920 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 80%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!