this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
531 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59039 readers
3763 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 158 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Wow, this is a very complex exploit, involving bits of iMessage and an undocumented CPU feature that allowed the attacker to evade hardware memory protection. From what I can see, Lockdown mode would have prevented this. The attacker is ridiculously skilled regardless

Exerpts from the article missing from the bot summary:

The mass backdooring campaign, which according to Russian officials also infected the iPhones of thousands of people working inside diplomatic missions and embassies in Russia, according to Russian government officials, came to light in June. Over a span of at least four years, Kaspersky said, the infections were delivered in iMessage texts that installed malware through a complex exploit chain without requiring the receiver to take any action.

With that, the devices were infected with full-featured spyware that, among other things, transmitted microphone recordings, photos, geolocation, and other sensitive data to attacker-controlled servers. Although infections didn’t survive a reboot, the unknown attackers kept their campaign alive simply by sending devices a new malicious iMessage text shortly after devices were restarted.

The most intriguing new detail is the targeting of the [...] hardware feature [...]. A zero-day in the feature allowed the attackers to bypass advanced hardware-based memory protections designed to safeguard device system integrity even after an attacker gained the ability to tamper with memory of the underlying kernel.

[–] [email protected] 132 points 10 months ago (1 children)

someone was made fun of one too many times about having green bubbles in imessage

[–] [email protected] 53 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The true villain origin story

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

i'm a bit of a texter myself, you know...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

And it was all Apple's fault for creating the problem and Batman never stopped them

[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Seems like the definition of advanced persistent threat.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It isn't persistent over a reboot, but the tested devices received new corrupted iMessages immediately after reboot

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Persistent in APT isn't referring to the malware itself, but rather the threat actor. I meant that this seems like a textbook APT actor.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

Reminded me restart all my devices

[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago (2 children)

With that many exploits being used I wouldn't be surprised to see it is a group probably government sponsored. They love iMessage exploits as original attack vectors too.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Russian authorities say it was the Americans trying to spy on other NATO nations, Israel, and Ukraine. America spying on Russia's enemies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Documentary about the pheonix software explains a lot about who used this kind of virus, mainly political figures and govermants to spy on other politicans and jornalists. The imessage exploit was known for a few years but nobody knew how the file installed itself on the device, so there was no way to figure out how to protect the device.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Which documentary?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The exploit's sophistication and the feature's obscurity suggest the attackers had advanced technical capabilities

exploiting a vulnerability in an undocumented hardware feature that few if anyone outside of Apple and chip suppliers such as ARM Holdings knew of.

according to Russian officials also infected the iPhones of thousands of people working inside diplomatic missions and embassies in Russia

the devices were infected with full-featured spyware that, among other things, transmitted microphone recordings, photos, geolocation, and other sensitive data to attacker-controlled servers

Sounds like government espionage

puts tinfoil hat on

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

4 zero days means they bought it on black market at least.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not purely talent that allows them to make this kind of stuff. Otherwise people outside of these agencies would be making this stuff too. It's also the fact the CIA or any of the others can go to apple for example and get all of the information on how these chips are made and the firmware on them, then put the company under a gag order.

It is silly to assume the governments hackers are any better then a good hacker that doesn't work for them. And you need to realise that their advantages come from legal power, resources, and lesser regulations on research.

Because a lot of silly conspiracy theories seem to stem from people believing that the government are somehow superior beings, when the only thing that makes them different from anyone else is power.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yup. The government has historically had issues keeping good hackers on their payroll. Because the good ones can make way more money in the private sector, so what incentive do they have to actually stick around?

There’s also the issue that the federal government has been required to drug test due to regulations requiring all federal employees to be tested. And good luck finding a good hacker who would be willing to take a drug test.

The only real edge the government hackers have is that they can force companies to give them insider access.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (4 children)

If you hire the hackers that tried to hack you instead of sending them to prison, you can fix the talent retention problem, but I think they already figured that out. Wonder if the kid who hacked GTA is being looked at in that way or if they don't want to deal with his mannerisms.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I recently invented a "People First" Cybersecurity Vulnerability Scoring method and I called it CITE, Civilian Internet Threat Evaluation with many benefits over CVSS. In it, I prioritize "exploit chains" as the primary threat going forward. Low and behold, this new exploit, although iOS, possibly one of the most sophisticated attacks ever using one of the longest exploit chains ever! Proof positive!

Depending on how you define it; I define the Kaspersky diagram has 8 steps. In my system, I define steps that advance the exploit discretely as stages, so I would evaluated Triangulation to be a 4 stage exploit chain. I should tally this attack to see how it scores and make a CITE-REP(ort).

You can read about it if interested. An intersting modeling problem for me was does stages always equate to complexity? Number of exploits in the chain make it easier or harder to intrusion detect given that it was designed as a chain, maybe to prevent just that? How are stages, complexity, chains and remediation evaluted inversely?

https://www.quadhelion.engineering/articles.html

[–] [email protected] 39 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

That's Standards, isn't it?

Edit: yup

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

is this how people who quote Bible verses feel? i can just surmise the meaning by the number and the context because I'm so familiar with the source

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

I just surmise by the context and end up usually correct so the numbers haven't quite clicked in yet

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

It must be, cause I immediately recognized the numbers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

no garfield 3:16

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Glancing through your article, while you have correctly assessed the need for risk based prioritization of vulnerability remediation and mitigation, your central premise is flawed.

Vulnerability is not threat— CVSS is a scoring system for individual vulnerabilities, not exploit chains. For that, you’ll want to compare with ATT&CK or the legacy cyber kill chain.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Thanks for sharing! I'm amazed at how sophisticated this was.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Researchers on Wednesday presented intriguing new findings surrounding an attack that over four years backdoored dozens if not thousands of iPhones, many of which belonged to employees of Moscow-based security firm Kaspersky.

Chief among the discoveries: the unknown attackers were able to achieve an unprecedented level of access by exploiting a vulnerability in an undocumented hardware feature that few if anyone outside of Apple and chip suppliers such as ARM Holdings knew of.

“The exploit's sophistication and the feature's obscurity suggest the attackers had advanced technical capabilities,” Kaspersky researcher Boris Larin wrote in an email.

“Our analysis hasn't revealed how they became aware of this feature, but we're exploring all possibilities, including accidental disclosure in past firmware or source code releases.

A fresh infusion of details disclosed Wednesday said that “Triangulation”—the name Kaspersky gave to both the malware and the campaign that installed it—exploited four critical zero-day vulnerabilities, meaning serious programming flaws that were known to the attackers before they were known to Apple.

The researchers found that several of MMIO addresses the attackers used to bypass the memory protections weren’t identified in any device tree documentation, which acts as a reference for engineers creating hardware or software for iPhones.


The original article contains 653 words, the summary contains 200 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

There are few groups I think they could pull off such a stunt and would even want to. Nation state actors from the US such as CIA/NSA, or China, like the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. They have a many other gov sectors with very talented APT groups. I'd bring up that NK nation state actors are also very talented, but they've been recently aligned with Russia. Perhaps their loyalty to the CCP is stronger than their current Russian ties.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Skill is certainly one evaluation parameter and Fin7, JokerStash, Carbanak fit that bill but that is not their MO. Target, motive, opportunity -> Embassy Employees/Diplomats -> Nation-State or Intergovernmental Group (like 5/9/14 eyes) as eval combined with skill rating, @95% confidence.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can't wait to listen to the Darknet Diaries interview about this in a few years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How do you find those podcasts, sometimes the stories are really interesting but I think he is running thin on ideas.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

not op, but I think it depends a lot on the person he's interviewing

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

I wonder how many of those exploits were long known by the three-letter agencies, and were hoarded instead of getting fixed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

It’s important to reboot your devices frequently

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Does ios have any ROP mitigations?

load more comments
view more: next ›