this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
19 points (95.2% liked)

Chess

1928 readers
1 users here now

Play chess on-line

FIDE Rankings

September 2023

# Player Country Elo
1 Magnus Carlsen ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด 2839
2 Fabiano Caruana ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 2786
3 Hikaru Nakamura ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 2780
4 Ding Liren ๐Ÿ† ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ 2780
5 Alireza Firouzja ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 2777
6 Ian Nepomniachtchi ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ 2771
7 Anish Giri ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ 2760
8 Gukesh D ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ 2758
9 Viswanathan Anand ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ 2754
10 Wesley So ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 2753

Tournaments

Speed Chess Championship 2023

September 4 - September 22

Check also

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am trying to start analyzing my games, but I am a bit unsure how to even go about doing that. I originally would have the computer analyze my game, and comment on what I think are the main points of the match I should keep in mind.

I have the following tips so far:

  • serious games, create a study to analyze
  • try to comment what went through your mind as you played the game
  • view what others did in a similar position using a database
  • have final comments/lessons learned
  • classify mistakes. leads to pattern recognition
  • computers don't fully understand openings *use computer analysis after my own analysis and see where my analysis went wrong
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Who are these games against? If it's otb, I'd strongly encourage talking it through with the opponent BEFORE putting it into the computer. There's a lot of ideas in chess (weak squares, pawn structure commitments, etc.) that are very hard for you to understand from a computer analysis, and conversely there may be moves you might make that are, at a human level, pretty reasonable, but that a computer sees leads to a highly complex tactical mistake.

Fundamentally, you want to be playing humans, and so you need to learn how to play well against humans. So analyse what the plans and ideas that you and your opponent were trying to enact. What were the key pawn pushes that shaped the areas of battle?

A book that has often been recommended is 'logical chess move by move', and I think that's a good place to look for how to analyse games. The author explains the ideas white and black are playing for with each move, both in the short and long term, for humans.

Obviously this is very detailed, and only worth going over for games with longer time controls, where you have the time to develop more complex ideas than just 'this looks good'.

A final thing that might be worth your while is (if you have the chance) finding a group of people you can play chess games with and talk to about your games on a casual basis. I play for a club, but also go along to a 'pub chess' night (the closest thing the UK has to coffee house chess!) that just has informal games among people of all ages and abilities. I'd highly recommend finding a space like this to play and chat. Good luck!

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Look for the first obvious (unforced) error you made, and try to work on that. The rest of the game is influenced by that first error, so for now, it's a lot less relevant. E.g. it's more useful to focus on not losing your Queen unnecessarily than to practice being down a Queen.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Also, try to analyze the problem from a broad perspective. If you always get stuck in a defensive position and then lose, try looking up theory for working from a defensive position. Or you can work improving your openings, so you take the initiative early on. There's loads of theory available online, so you don't have to do all the thinking yourself