this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
292 points (95.9% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35571 readers
619 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No you’re getting billed for this too

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The coast guard will be asking for more funding to reimburse the cost of the search and rescue. Guess where their funding comes from?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Worse they will get to sue everyone associated with the failed rescue.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (16 children)

What really makes me angry is that media is full of some millionaires drowning in a rattle can steered with a 30$ Logitech controller while there are 100s of people drowning in the Mediterranean Sea every week because they are illegally pushed back by authorities and media is silent about it...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What do you mean, the media is silent about this? There's tons of articles about that exact thing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But for the last 4 days the very top of every newsanchors' headline was something else. Probably that's what he means.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Billionaires, huuuuuuuge difference in wealth even if it's only a letter apart

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

A million seconds is 11 eleven days, a billion seconds is 31 years

Always remember that difference to have a filling of how filthy rich billionaires are

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Where I live if you fall and injure yourself on an established hiking/climbing route, in season, you will be rescued for free (regular ambulance rides are free anyway).

If you climb or hike off track, out of season you might be charged for a helicopter ride or mountain rescue. As you can imagine it's not cheap.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

regular ambulance rides are free anyway

what in tarnation

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Non-americans are not shocked by this😇

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

That should be on case in all of Europe (in Germany and Italy for sure). It's covered but your insurance as long as there is an emergency. So you can't just use the ambulance as a taxi, then you would be billed the whole amount.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

This seems quite reasonable to me, and if you are doing the more risky activities, then presumably you'd get some insurance to take the edge off the rescue charges.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (12 children)

The coast guard has never charged for search and rescue. This was not an ambulance ride.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would have expected that the owner of the submarine pieces would be footing the bill for this. After all, he is at the head of this fuck-up.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

is it bad that I read "floating the bill for this" ?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, dude won't float for a while

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remeber that time a couple wanted to sail around the world, bought a boat but didn't know how to sail rally, took their newborn on it, then had to get rescued at sea? People were pissed about the cost of that rescue, calling the couple dumb and entitled and whatnot. I think they had to pay some of the rescue cost back. Personally I don't know that I'm wild about charging people for rescues, it's hard to draw a line between legitimate adventure travel, say hiking in a national park, and a reckless stunt.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I haven't landed at a position on it either, but I could definitely see how if people understood they had to pay at least some portion of the rescue costs, they will try to be more educated and prepared when venturing out into the wild/at sea. Its extremely important to take this stuff seriously and too many people already treat nature like a joke and get themselves in terrible situations cause they just know a helicopter can come pick them up*

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Similar kind of stuff happens all the time, where public institutions bear the cost and consequences of private enterprises. Good example of a not too dissimilar situation was Memorial Hospital during Katrina, where instead of sending private helicopters and rescue, the firm that owned the hospital opted to wait for "free" US government rescue.

Privatize the profits, but socialize the losses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If this is referring to the submarine rescue, generally-speaking, rescue efforts by the US Coast Guard or the Park Service or the like are paid for by the government. Interestingly, at least for the Park Service, this is the opposite of the situation with Europe, where it's common to have rescue insurance if one is heading out into the wilderness hiking or whatnot. This is the reverse of the situation with medical services.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Which means ultimately it's paid by us.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

In general I'm all for having it paid for but in this instance, nope.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

It will probably be the company that owns the sub that get's billed. Given that the founder and CEO of the company was the pilot of the sub the company will probably declare bankruptcy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In my state we have a stupid motorist law that bills the driver if the drive into a flooded wash and need to get rescued. This typw of law should apply. Accidents are Accidents. But if you willfully ignore safety regulations and signage you get the bill.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Tbf if its proven the titan wasn't up to regulation it should 100% be the company that build the sub that needs to be held accountable. If not the bill should go to whatever got the rescue people involved. Then the insurance that covered such exotic and dangerous ride. (Just like i had insurance when i went to see the pyramids). If its not any above the above than it means the passengers took 100% responsibility and the families should pay up.

Hundereds of immigrants died this week on a ship, no one gave a fuck. Not a penny spend.

I am hoping someone more informed then me can do a comparison how long we could provide shelter and food to those immigrants with that amount of spend money. The internet cant enforce fair economic treatment between the classes but we can call out the hypocrisy.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I wonder to what extent the massive imbalance in news coverage was simply super wealthy families handing journalists pre-written pieces so that laziness would dictate this result (rather than the journalists doing this naturally, although laziness is natural enough I guess).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Of course not. No consequences for the billionaires. Instead, we will pay.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Nah, that sort of shit is for plebs.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh this is when their lawyers turn around and point out they were doing some kind of scientific “research” on behalf of someone’s pet charity organization so it’s all exempt and they pay zero.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I got a $2000 bill for an ambulance. And then kept getting nickel and dimed by them for $200, $100 charges for the next two years. The whole system is screwed up.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The submersible that imploded near the Titanic wreck.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish. But what I know of the current affair of things, I can only hypothesize two outcomes:

  1. The benefit after the costs of potential rescue, and now the discovery of 5 recognizable pieces of the craft, will be a learning moment and there will be more regulation of deep sea diving for tourism in the near future. And the families of the victims will say that's enough and probably name the legislation after one, or a few of the victims.

  2. The family of the victims will make sure OceanGate will never build another deep sea vessel ever again. This one will depend on the legal logistics. Just like how some airlines caused airliner crashes due to pure negligence, some of the first-class families weren't able to sue them into non-existence due to international airspace and/or waters protections.

Because either of those two things are what typically happens in such a scenario. At least lately.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Downplayed as a good "training exercise"...

load more comments
view more: next ›