this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
45 points (95.9% liked)

United Kingdom

4068 readers
502 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

It just shows up how pathetic their pretence at wanting free speech and preventing deplatforming is. Really what they want is their lies and hate mongering to be unchallenged and their challengers to be shut up.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

I don’t know about y’all but I don’t find it to be shocking at all.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Trust the Observer to find stuff like this and frame it as "hugely embarrassing for [the] Conservative party". I don't think these people will be embarrassed about anything except perhaps being found out

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Fifteen government departments have been monitoring the social media activity of potential critics and compiling “secret files” in order to block them from speaking at public events, the Observer can reveal.

The revelations will be hugely embarrassing for a Conservative party that regularly claims to champion free speech and has slammed universities for allowing students to “no platform” experts with whom they disagree.

Tessa Gregory, partner at Leigh Day, who is pursuing legal action against the government on behalf of at least two experts, said: “This is likely to have impacted large numbers of individuals, many of whom won’t know civil servants hold secret files on them.

Dan Kaszeta, a chemical weapons expert, was disinvited in April from giving a keynote speech at a UK defence conference after officials found social media posts criticising Tory ministers and government immigration policy.

But in response to an FoI request from the campaign group Privacy International last year, the DfE said three times that it “does not conduct monitoring, investigations or intelligence gathering on members of the public”.

Smita Jamdar, partner at law firm Shakespeare Martineau who has been advising universities on how not to fall foul of the government’s new higher education “free speech tsar”, said: “The double standards here are astonishing.”


The original article contains 986 words, the summary contains 210 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!