Media bias / fact check for The Grayzone:
Overall, we rate The Grayzone Far-Left Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and consistent one-sided reporting.
News from around the world!
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
Media bias / fact check for The Grayzone:
Overall, we rate The Grayzone Far-Left Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and consistent one-sided reporting.
I wouldn't trust The Gray Zone to be a reliable source.
Paraphrasing: “Aaron doesn’t agree in lockstep with American military propaganda so we added this disclaimer to discredit his near-perfect record of truthful journalism.”
another wiki link for ya https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
Feel free to correct the Wikipedia article about the website then if you consider it incorrect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grayzone
https://www.codastory.com/disinformation/grayzone-xinjiang-denialism/
My point still stand that the website isn't a reliable source and goes against this community rules (Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc).
Saying the Gray Zone is disinformation...
Based on them denying a genocide theory that's been spread primarily by Adrian Zenz, a radical right-wing Christian extremist funded by the US government?
You find it directly in the list of questionable sources by Mediabiasfactcheck
Citing MBFC, known for being reliable and unbiased /s
You are right, lets look it up in ZerfuffleMediaBiasFactCheck.com, the fact checks for Zerfuffle facts.